The Label "RFC"
draft-thomson-rfcplusplus-label-00
This document is an Internet-Draft (I-D).
Anyone may submit an I-D to the IETF.
This I-D is not endorsed by the IETF and has no formal standing in the
IETF standards process.
Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Author | Martin Thomson | ||
Last updated | 2019-01-03 (Latest revision 2018-07-02) | ||
RFC stream | (None) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The perception and reality of the RFC series have long been separate. More than 20 years of attempts to correct perception, starting with RFC 1796, have been unsuccessful. This document proposes an experiment to see if changing the labels on document will have any effect on fixing that problem.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)