You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
People like that Paguro is small (less than 250K). I don't want to keep code that no-one is using when there are better ways of doing those things. Without that code, Paguro currently goes from 229,935 to 218,672 bytes which is 11K or about 5% difference. What do you think about eliminating those for Paguro 3.0?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm talking about the wrapper classes, empty unmodifiable constructors and wrapper methods in FunctionalUtils. They seemed like a step in the right direction before incorporating the persistent collections from Clojure.
A year or two after adding the Clojure collections, I have removed all usages from client code. Instead I always use the data definition shortcuts in StaticImports like
vec(...)
,set(...)
, etc., orxform(oldCollection)
.People like that Paguro is small (less than 250K). I don't want to keep code that no-one is using when there are better ways of doing those things. Without that code, Paguro currently goes from 229,935 to 218,672 bytes which is 11K or about 5% difference. What do you think about eliminating those for Paguro 3.0?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: