Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Infer from generic function return types #16072

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
May 26, 2017
Merged

Conversation

ahejlsberg
Copy link
Member

@ahejlsberg ahejlsberg commented May 25, 2017

With this PR we improve type argument inference by inferring from the contextual type of a generic function call to the return type of the generic function. For example:

function emptyArray<T>(): T[] {
    return [];
}

let a1: string[] = emptyArray();  // string inferred for T
let a2: number[] = emptyArray();  // number inferred for T

Previously the two assignments above would error because {} was inferred for T. We now infer from the contextual type (i.e. the type of the variable to which the function result is assigned).

A more elaborate example:

function arrayFilter<T>(f: (x: T) => boolean): (a: T[]) => T[] {
    return a => a.filter(f);
}

function arrayMap<T, U>(f: (x: T) => U): (a: T[]) => U[] {
    return a => a.map(f);
}

function compose<A, B, C>(f: (x: A) => B, g: (x: B) => C): (x: A) => C {
    return x => g(f(x));
}

const positives: (a: number[]) => number[] = arrayFilter(x => x >= 0);
const lengths: (a: string[]) => number[] = arrayMap(s => s.length);
const evenLengths: (a: string[]) => number[] =
    compose(arrayMap(s => s.length), arrayFilter(x => x % 2 === 0));

let a1 = positives([1, 2, -3, 4, -5]);            // [1, 2, 4]
let a2 = lengths(['a', 'bb', 'ccc', 'dddd']);     // [1, 2, 3]
let a3 = evenLengths(['a', 'bb', 'ccc', 'dddd']); // [2, 4]

Inferences made from generic function return types have lower priority than inferences made from arguments to the generic function. For example, the type of s is inferred as string (not Object) in the following:

function filter<T>(a: T[], f: (x: T) => boolean): T[] {
    return a.filter(f);
}

let a: Object[] = filter(['a', 'bb', 'ccc', 'dddd'], s => s.length > 2);

This PR is a precursor for inferring higher order function types when no inferences can be made for one or more type parameters.

const wrapper = compose(x => [x], y => ({ p: y }));  // (x: {}) => { p: {}[] }

We currently infer (x: {}) => { p: {}[] }, but ideally we'd infer <A>(x: A) => { p: A[] }. That's next on the list.

Fixes #15680.

@benlesh
Copy link

benlesh commented May 25, 2017

I was told "if you get Anders interested in your typings issue, it'll be implemented in a few hours"

Apparently the legend is real.

@@ -10288,27 +10293,24 @@ namespace ts {
// it as an inference candidate. Hopefully, a better candidate will come along that does
// not contain anyFunctionType when we come back to this argument for its second round
// of inference.
if (source.flags & TypeFlags.ContainsAnyFunctionType) {
if (source.flags & TypeFlags.ContainsAnyFunctionType || source === silentNeverType) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

worth adding a note on the use of silentNeverType as a marker here.

inferences.primary || (inferences.primary = []);
if (!contains(candidates, source)) {
candidates.push(source);
for (const inference of inferences) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

getInferenceInfoForType here as well?

@RyanCavanaugh
Copy link
Member

Why doesn't this fix #11152 ?

@mhegazy
Copy link
Contributor

mhegazy commented May 30, 2017

Why doesn't this fix #11152 ?

contextual type is not propagated/instantiated correctly yet.

@KiaraGrouwstra
Copy link
Contributor

@ahejlsberg:

We currently infer (x: {}) => { p: {}[] }, but ideally we'd infer <A>(x: A) => { p: A[] }. That's next on the list.

If that's still outstanding, might there be any PR/branch we could follow on that?

@johnnyreilly
Copy link

contextual type is not propagated/instantiated correctly yet.

@mhegazy - I'm liking the use of the word "yet" above 👍 😄

@AlexGalays
Copy link

Where can we track progress against the following bug?

type Function1<T1, R> = (t1: T1) => R


function pipe<T1, R>(fn: Function1<T1, R>): Function1<T1, R> {
    return fn
}


/// test

function identity<A>(a: A): A { return a }


const pipedIdentity = pipe(identity)

// x is a {}, not a number
const x = pipedIdentity(33)
@gcnew
Copy link
Contributor

gcnew commented Nov 2, 2017

@AlexGalays see #9366 and the linked issues.

@mhegazy mhegazy deleted the improveTypeArgumentInference branch November 2, 2017 19:09
@microsoft microsoft locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 14, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
9 participants