Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Renaming functions / API redesign for v1.0 #102

Open
chakravala opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Renaming functions / API redesign for v1.0 #102

chakravala opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@chakravala
Copy link
Owner

chakravala commented May 22, 2023

There will be another v0.9 release, followed by a 1.0 release of Grassmann in the future. In the v0.9 to v1.0 transition is the final opportunity to make internal breaking changes with regards to renaming functions / API redesign.

Does anyone wish to contribute specific comments about a v0.9/v1.0 redesign for Grassmann API and renaming some functions?

@utensil
Copy link

utensil commented May 22, 2023

Personally, I would love to test the symbolical support of fully general metric tensor . Is there any doc or specific commits that I can check?

@chakravala
Copy link
Owner Author

That's been planned for the next release v0.9, I've been saving the fully general metric tensor as the last step for various reasons related to the order of features in which I want to design the package. I am currently working on several commits for the general metric tensor and symbolic computation with it, but it's a work in progress and I won't be committing it until I settle on a design. Unfortunately, I also lost some work in progress when my SSD died a few months back, but I will recover from it.

@chakravala
Copy link
Owner Author

@utensil arbitrary MetricTensor support has been added now, so Grassmann is entering the v0.9 phase for transition to v1.0

@basis MetricTensor([0 -1 0; -1 0 0; 0 0 1])
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants