Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is it possible to enable the Require() Import ? #392

Open
Philrobots opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Is it possible to enable the Require() Import ? #392

Philrobots opened this issue May 9, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@Philrobots
Copy link

Philrobots commented May 9, 2024

Hello,

I have a typescript application and I use your tool. In my Typescript file, I import your library dynamically with the

import { extract } from “@extractus/article-extractor”;

But once the code compiles in Javascript, it converts to

const article_extractor_1 = require(“@extractus/article-extractor”);

And I get an error :

const article_extractor_1 = require("@extractus/article-extractor");

Error [ERR_REQUIRE_ESM]: require() of ES Module 

** to a dynamic import() which is available in all CommonJS modules.

Is it possible to make the import available with require like the old article-parser library?

Thanks

@Philrobots Philrobots changed the title Is it possible to access the Require() Import ? May 9, 2024
@keypuncheralwin
Copy link

Yeah, the only reason why I'm not using this package is I run into this when I build my typescipt project. I don't want to have to restructure my whole project for this one package.

@Philrobots, were you able to come up with a workaround for this?

@Philrobots
Copy link
Author

Yeah, the only reason why I'm not using this package is I run into this when I build my typescipt project. I don't want to have to restructure my whole project for this one package.

@Philrobots, were you able to come up with a workaround for this?

RIght now, I use the last version that accept require import

v7.2.6

@ndaidong
Copy link
Collaborator

@Philrobots @keypuncheralwin sorry for the inconvenience. I will try to revert CJS version in the next release.

@Philrobots
Copy link
Author

@Philrobots @keypuncheralwin sorry for the inconvenience. I will try to revert CJS version in the next release.

thank you very much

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants