Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For everyone looking for a working and more complete version #64

Open
Auties00 opened this issue Apr 24, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

For everyone looking for a working and more complete version #64

Auties00 opened this issue Apr 24, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@Auties00
Copy link

Hello,
I created a more complete version of this tool that does everything automatically built on top of my WhatsappWeb library. If anyone needs it: https://github.com/Auties00/whatsappweb4j-request-analyzer

@SLAYER-CODE
Copy link

Funci

Hola,
creé una versión más completa de esta herramienta que hace todo automáticamente construido sobre mi biblioteca WhatsappWeb. Si alguien lo necesita: https://github.com/Auties00/whatsappweb4j-request-analyzer

The interception of the packets works and it only shows the payload, I'm almost sure there is a way to revert the whole key and get the same result for burpsuit with the project you show ...
(WhatsappKeysManager.java) Or am I wrong?

@Auties00
Copy link
Author

Funci

Hola,
creé una versión más completa de esta herramienta que hace todo automáticamente construido sobre mi biblioteca WhatsappWeb. Si alguien lo necesita: https://github.com/Auties00/whatsappweb4j-request-analyzer

The interception of the packets works and it only shows the payload, I'm almost sure there is a way to revert the whole key and get the same result for burpsuit with the project you show ...
(WhatsappKeysManager.java) Or am I wrong?

i don't know if it can be done, technically the keys are generated locally in the browser, they are not sent from the server to the client as they should be secret. The way I intercept them is by using the debugger API of the chrome dev tools.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants