Timeline for We spent a sprint addressing your requests — here’s how it went
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2 at 14:47 | comment | added | Slate StaffMod | The prioritization method used this quarter was a rough cut at creating a list of uncontroversial and relatively recognizable community requests. It was just enough to get us started, and try out the associated processes, without worrying too much about how these action items would be received. Future quarters may use different methods as we play around to find what works best, as well. | |
| Jul 1 at 23:48 | history | edited | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 313 characters in body
|
| Jul 1 at 23:41 | comment | added | Journeyman Geek | I'd argue for 'triage' activity is a reasonable sign. One potential downside is though folks tactically bumping, or rerequesting things - if its even a downside. I mean I do sometimes do this when the staff are working on something ancillary to my big wishlist :D | |
| Jul 1 at 23:29 | history | edited | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 32 characters in body
|
| Jul 1 at 19:58 | history | edited | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 307 characters in body
|
| Jul 1 at 19:43 | history | edited | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 528 characters in body
|
| Jul 1 at 19:38 | history | edited | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 627 characters in body
|
| Jul 1 at 19:27 | history | answered | starball | CC BY-SA 4.0 |