Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

14
  • 2
  • 2
    Would you like (a) a list of fraud that can be only done under vote-by-mail; or (b) math showing that fraud under vote-by-mail would exceed fraud in the normal system, even excluding classic voter suppression tactics? The first is answerable; the second is, in IMO, not demonstratable. Commented Jul 30, 2020 at 23:02
  • 3
    I'm inclined to vote to close this for the reason that we're not here to rationalize and support the random assertions of a madman (or anyone else, that's just the salt in the wound). This is the sort of thing that agenda-pushers jump on or initiate. Commented Aug 6, 2020 at 0:38
  • 2
    @zibadawatimmy, perhaps I'm being overly gracious, but I tend to look at this question as an honest request for facts to support an argument rather than a veiled attempt to rationalize "assertions of a madman". There are arguments that can be made to support those assertions, albeit that IMO those factual arguments are weak and non-persuasive. I believe that those fact arguments should be heard, and countered as necessary.
    – BobE
    Commented Aug 6, 2020 at 18:01
  • 1
    @AffableAmbler It's definitely very difficult at best, which is precisely why politicians tend to invoke such rhetorical devices. The actual validity and significance of the evidence and support they claim is a different matter from simply enumerating the justifications provided. That might be suited for a question on Skeptics, though it's highly likely they have one or more well-answered questions relating to claims of voter fraud (mail-in and otherwise) already. Commented Aug 6, 2020 at 19:45