Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ "If we exclude strategies that involve saying "largest" or "smallest" at random (which cannot exceed 50% win rate)" - why not? A mixed strategy could be better than a pure strategy. $\endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    Commented Jul 3 at 13:34
  • $\begingroup$ You're right. I think I took the problem the wrong way by trying to figure out Bndrew's best strategy and not Andrew's best strategy (which I end up doing in the last paragraph). @ralphmerridew just posted an answer that is less confused and way more concise; I encourage upvoting his answer :) $\endgroup$
    – Jujustum
    Commented Jul 3 at 14:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Deusovi : Sure, a mixed strategy can be better, but is it always implicit that mixed strategies are allowed? Having access to a random coin that is independent of the given numbers seems like a nontrivial advantage. $\endgroup$
    – Plop
    Commented Jul 4 at 8:02