Timeline for Calling prototype method from another method
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2014 at 6:26 | audit | Suggested edits | |||
| Oct 9, 2014 at 6:27 | |||||
| Sep 9, 2014 at 21:08 | vote | accept | user3312508 | ||
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:56 | answer | added | Bergi | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:54 | history | edited | user3312508 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2852 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:53 | vote | accept | user3312508 | ||
| Sep 9, 2014 at 21:08 | |||||
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:45 | comment | added | Bergi |
@user3312508: Please show that part as well. You need to use the variable with the instance, not this. The $('#' + this.ID + ' .selMake').on('change', this.getCarModel); should go in that file as well (or, if you want to execute it for all instance, in the constructor). Placing it outside of everything doesn't make sense.
|
|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:43 | history | edited | Huangism | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed tag from title
|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:43 | comment | added | user3312508 | @Bergi I have its in a different js file.Is it possible to add event listener to the object? | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:41 | comment | added | Bergi |
@user3312508: You don't even have created an instance of vehicleSelect!
|
|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:40 | comment | added | user3312508 | @Bergi Added the full code | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:40 | history | edited | user3312508 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2852 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:37 | comment | added | Bergi | Can you please show the full code, including the surrounding function? | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:36 | answer | added | Barmar | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:35 | comment | added | Bergi |
You must pass a function to .on(), not the result of a call!
|
|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:35 | comment | added | Travis J | Related: stackoverflow.com/questions/24173440/save-access-to-this-scope | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:29 | comment | added | Barmar | @wootscootinboogie No it isn't, since that code isn't in a callback function. | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:27 | answer | added | Jorge Silva | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 9, 2014 at 20:26 | history | asked | user3312508 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |