THE WASH MICROFINANCE HALO - A NEXUS FOR FEMALE EMPOWERMENT?
A CLOSER LOOK AT THE IMPACT FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS
Within my recent Masters dissertation, I consider the question of ethics around corporate ‘gender empowerment’ language, specifically as it has been applied to microfinance loans for water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH).
Often presented in near charitable terms, I find that glossy brochures have a tendency to present microfinance loans as the foundational solution for gendered problems in some of the world’s poorest societies. In other words, gender related problems have notably been viewed as the conversation starter or ‘hook’ for many microfinance programmes, targeted specifically at female debtors. Advantages claimed for women and girls include long term financial and domestic emancipation through impacts such as time saving, purportedly allowing space to work and earn income outside the home. Wider physical health benefits are often noted.
Within my discussion, I consider the meaning of female empowerment. I note that microfinance for WASH can indeed be viewed as having generated some positive interventions in gender terms, including the implementation of associated programmes raising local consciousness of issues.
However, it remains critical not to overlook that many microfinance loans are ultimately provided on what essentially constitute commercial terms for interest. They are often taken up in circumstances where there may be very little choice with regards to how the family access their human right to water and basic needs. For example, willing entry by women into micro finance loan documents requires literacy and a basic level of legal understanding of repayment terms, if it is not to lead to what has been termed the further ‘feminization of indebtedness’[1].
With the need to consider each programme on a case-by-case basis, my dissertation reviews a case study from Bangladesh. More generally, it asks proponents of WASH microfinance programmes to further reflect on the fact that, notwithstanding the purported benefits, the true impact of microfinance for women and girls should neither be ‘green washed’ nor ‘gender washed’ by the corporate sales machine. This requires acknowledging, for example, that in many circumstances, whilst microfinance may be one solution, there may well be other, more empowering ones. I argue that, at the very least, the realities of the WASH loan halo should not be mis-sold.
With greatest of thanks to the University of Kent and my supervisor, Professor Luis Eslava, my full work is available for the benefit of my LinkedIn contacts upon request. I would be happy to consider any questions by private message.
[1] Christa Wichterich (2012):
So great partnering together to measure the lived experience of women in microfinance Kiva!