"So Many Dicks!" I have heard from many people about their reaction to E.L.F. BEAUTY's highly visible campaign to #changetheboardgame. Beyond the attention grabbing headline, “Change the Board Game” stems from research which found that men named Richard, Rick, and Dick ("Dicks") outnumber women and diverse groups on public company boards. It’s not that there are “So Many Dicks,” it’s just that there are so few of everyone else. I'm proud to be a part of the inclusive Board of Directors (2/3 women and 1/3 diverse) that ELF has created. But the ELF team is not satisfied with being one of only four out of 4,200+ publicly traded companies in the U.S. who can say this. Thus, this super creative call to action! If you want partner to drive change and create a more inclusive future, you can learn more at: https://lnkd.in/gBKKtuzq
My friend MaryElizabeth Williams reminded me of this: https://youtu.be/xk1kwfK848Y?si=AY1M6eudJ-5hiZO5
As someone named Rick……I have to weigh in. This campaign is brilliant. It’s true. And its purposeful. The answer to the question of how many women should be on Boards and Executive Leadership…..is MORE, MORE, MORE!!!
Dear Lauren, we are so proud that you serve on the e.l.f. Beauty Board. You’ve made an incredible difference over the years to the direction of the company. Thank you, thank you!
Lauren Cooks Levitan Cheeky and perfect. Let’s keep evolving boards one Dick at a time for the reasons John mentions. 😊PS the irony of Dick’s Sporting Goods reporting strong earnings … they happen to have a CEO Lauren Hobart
As a mom of two teen boys, feels like we aren’t offering other ideas.
Such an amazing campaign and purpose. I love it ♥️. We have to make big changes fast, it’s too slow.
Great campaign and congratulations on the great business results.
So good-:). Brilliant campaign.
Fundamental Financial Analysis | $2B+ Investment Asset Management | Ultra-High Net Worth Clients
1moFifty years ago for my honors thesis as an undergraduate senior at UC Berkeley I reviewed the contributions of three women to the field of economics: Joan Robinson, Mary Marshall and Rose Friedman. That two of these women were the spouses of reknown male economists smacked to me more a function of scarcity of women than my own tokenism. It wasn't until I read about Anna Schwartz receiving short shrift from Milton Friedman that it struck me that greater visibility of women served the purpose of greater integrity versus men voicing women's ideas as their own was not only unjust, but impairing the intellectual community of economics by diluting and distorting ideas originated by women. It is gratifying in recent years that the wife of my senior thesis advisor George Akerlof is herself vocal on the merit of economics being more inclusive of women: that is, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. What are the reasons we need more women on boards? 1. More innovative and effective solutions. 2. Greater accountability and transperancy in corporate governance. 3. According to statistical evidence, improved financial performance. 4. Better identify and address long-term strategic risk. 5. Enhance company reputation and brand image.