Maarten Ectors’ Post

View profile for Maarten Ectors, graphic

Multi-Award Winning Exponential Growth Innovator | NextTech fCTO/fCPO/fCRO | AI, Web3, IoT, Spatial, GreenTech | Helping you Launch and Grow Exponential NextTech Ventures

Financial Times just published an opinion piece that must be one of the worst articles I read about tokenisation in a long time. Points like "using permissionless blockchains is bad" are completely absurd. What does professor Allen suggest? Use private Cobol systems? That would basically be the status quo. Scaling problems will soon be solved with Ethereum fast becoming the super ledger for fast and cheap tier 2 ledgers. Not being able to trust the code? Well permissionless smart contracts are open source so every hacker can see the code. If code which protects billions is not hacked after years then probably it is more secure than banks ' cobol code. Hands up the bank that wants to publish its code because they think it is so secure it is unhackable? Netting better than atomic settlement???? What if the other party does not pay at the end of the day? Will never happen with atomic. So many holes... https://lnkd.in/e2gTz8BK

The dark side of tokenisation

The dark side of tokenisation

ft.com

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics