Ever wonder why some startups skyrocket while others crash and burn? I’ve been working with startups & scale-ups this past year, and one thing is for sure, they all work hard. However, some take an approach that I think Sam Altman summarizes best on what REALLY matters … Altman boils it down to 3 ruthless principles: 1. Small, scrappy teams: Big egos and bloated teams? They'll crush your agility and stifle creativity. 2. Big, bold bets: Incremental improvements won't cut it (that’s a game of enterprises). Swing for the fences or go home. 3. Zero tolerance for mediocrity: Average won’t win. Only the best and brightest will survive.
He must be right 😄
When a team understands its goals and aligns its efforts, it can achieve remarkable results.
That’s the startup DNA, but I think eventually they transition into different ways of working as soon as they scale and priorities change, specially the ones coming from its investors
Sol Rashidi it's paradoxical to cite Sam Altman here. Big Ego? Check. Incremental improvements? Check. Mediocre? Check. You deserve a better hero.
And maybe no time waste on drama? 😂
Insight nailed - team culture trumps all. Small bets = small wins.
This reminds me of 'Fortune favors the courageous.' Risk-taking requires courage.
Absolutely! Startups thrive when they embody agility, innovation through bold moves, and a relentless pursuit of excellence.
I can't help but wonder what we mean by mediocrity and tolerance. People and their performance can simultaneously be the best and brightest yet deliver mediocrity. And by tolerance do we mean that we fire people and disassemble org/group structures whenever we have a less than stellar performance? Ruthless seems like it's at odds with the more valuable Relentless. I think I understand the point, yet this approach seems to leave ample room to lose value.
Founder @ MotivatedLeads.com & MarketerHire.com | Expert in Growth Marketing
1moThe best teams are often the ones that embrace a culture of experimentation and risk-taking.