Tad Bohannon, JD, LLM, MBA’s Post

View profile for Tad Bohannon, JD, LLM, MBA, graphic

Casual, fun-loving CEO driven to improve communities and ensure sustainable business operations

Part of the argument is missing here. The ratepayers and the taxpayers are the same. So, what is the reasoning for shifting the burden from ratepayers to taxpayers? Bailouts for poorly run systems? Protection of elected officials who have refused for decades to do what is necessary to properly fund their own system? Rewarding bad management? Funding LIHWAP assist ratepayers who need assistance due to life’s circumstances. Hopefully it is a hand up. Funding poorly funded or managed systems is a bailout. Consolidation and regionalization away from politically controlled governance to independent public entities free of election cycle politics should be a requirement for federal tax dollar rescues. While I have some concerns about EPA’s proposed system assessment rule, it is clearly a step in the right direction. Biggest concern? By the time a system goes through all the requirements, the customers will have been drinking bad water for months, if not years.

Bingo! And many of the TAT programs only prolong the pain.

Robert Birch

#rediscoverjacksonville Director of Economic Development

2w

Well said!!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics