Makes perfect sense that this article is posted under the byline of Newsweek’s reporter based in London, UK, whose beat is US and European politics, global affairs, and housing… right?!
It’s absolutely ridiculous.
Tracy Mehan’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
U.S. workers paid more than $1 trillion into Social Security last year. Younger ones doubt they will get a dime when they retire. https://lnkd.in/et5g5fiB the more likely scenario is a 25% reduction in benefits. Not fun.
Young Workers Fear They Will Never See a Cent From Social Security
wsj.com
-
Interesting development.
America’s HR Lobby Scraps the ‘E’ From DEI
wsj.com
-
https://lnkd.in/eRCstMwR Basic truth.
Friendly reminder that relying on federal money to fix the chronic problem of underinvestment in aging water infrastructure is a risky proposition. If we value piped water service we need to pay for it--while finding ways to support those in our communities who are unable to do so. https://lnkd.in/gMtRbWA4
In praise of the monthly water bill
https://thehill.com
President at WaterPIO
1wI'm dealing with drought notifications for clients throughout the South and Mid-Atlantic. Newsweek, once again, using a clickbait headline that its own copy undercuts. And they purposefully used "permanent water restrictions" because they know it will mix in their story with the notifications utilities have to put out during this heat wave. "The new regulation, which was approved by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) on Wednesday, will require the state's largest water utilities—which serve 95 percent of California residents—to reduce the amount of water they provide over the next 15 years. It doesn't apply directly to households or individuals in the state." If you think about it, nature's going to beat them to the punch if they don't take action.