But What Can we DO About Misinformation?
It’s abundantly clear that misinformation is a dangerous scourge on our society. I’m actually tired of seeing polls and studies that merely quantify and point out how bad of a problem it is. We have abundant evidence. Think of how many people died from both coronavirus and extremist violence in the past 12 months alone due to misinformation, and how the foundations of our democracy have been shattered.
Now it is time to take concrete action to combat it.
People ask me “how do we fix this problem?”
Let me clearly explain what I think are the solutions to this problem and what my company, Ad Fontes Media, is doing to implement them.
First, know that there is not one silver bullet—not one single, easy solution—that will eliminate this problem. No fix of one law (e.g., Fairness Doctrine reinstatement or Section 230 repeal), will provide a complete solution. No unilateral action by entities, even powerful ones like social media companies, will eradicate the scourge.
The truth is that ALL of the following stakeholders in good news media have important roles to play in improving our news media ecosystem. Ad Fontes Media provides services for all of these stakeholders. Here are the concrete steps each stakeholder needs to take to do their part.
Consumers: Need to get better at discerning news sources and not spreading misinformation
Educators: Need to teach media literacy more widely and effectively in schools
Reputable Publishers: Need to monitor and improve their own reputations for reliability and bias, avoiding the temptation of polarization for profitability
Marketers: Need to use their advertising dollars to support good journalism and avoid funding polarizing junk news
Academic Researchers: Need to study the relationships between media diets and social, political, and health effects
Government: Needs to understand the scope of extremist news and disinformation to assess national security risks; needs to implement effective incentives and deterrents for publishers and platforms spreading misinformation
Social Media Platforms: Need to label, monitor, and, when necessary, remove misinformation, and provide users tools to understand can control the types of content they are being fed.
One thing all of these stakeholders need as a baseline are ratings—measurements—of news and news-like sources for reliability and bias to take the actions required. The ratings need to be non-partisan, teachable, granular, and methodologically rigorous. That’s why we rate the news, and that’s why our business is doing news ratings for the stakeholders in good news media.
So if you want to do something about the scourge of misinformation, join us, as an investor, a customer, or both. It is time.
https://wefunder.com/ad.fontes.media
AI Ethics Officer at Army Artificial Intelligence Integration Center (AI2C)
2yI feel that you may have missed labeled the TYT network. While they are very clear that they have a progressive view. When it comes to reporting the news they provide full context to a story and supporting evidence. they will provide analysis of both left and right wing media and again provide analysis and full context where other media sites have failed to do so. And they do a very good job of clearly articulating and explaining what exactly policies are being presented. They ask follow-up questions they dig for further answers where other media outlets seem to follow a given narrative. So while they are undoubtably progressive they provide accurate news reporting. They should fall much closer in the middle than where you have them list it. A lot of people have changed their views and even parties after beginning to follow the TYT Network because TYT provided the analysis that other big corporate media’s out which did not.
C, C++ Senior Contract Dev (Remote or Kanata/ON)
3yPlease add the CBC and I'll invest :-)
Founder and Senior Launch Manager at Stringwall
3yWe’re working toward deploying your data in new ways!
Musician, Student Success Coach (Higher Education)
3yProfessor Lance Porter this is good. She identifies "ratings."