[css-scroll-animations] Implment Scroll Progress Timelines based on new declarative syntax (without JS API)
Categories
(Core :: CSS Transitions and Animations, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: mozilla-apprentice, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 2 open bugs, Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Keywords: dev-doc-needed)
Resolutions were made for csswg-drafts/#6674.
[css-scroll-animations] Rethinking declarative syntax for scroll-linked animations
- RESOLVED: Adopt fantasai/miriam's new direction for the declarative side of scroll-linked animations
- RESOLVED: Add flackr as editor to scroll-animations, move Majid to Former
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
|
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
|
|
||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Elika is working on rewriting the spec now in rewrite.bs: https://drafts.csswg.org/scroll-animations-1/rewrite.
|
|
||
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
Only need dev-doc-needed keyword in this bug because it'd be better to finish all of the dependencies first before we start to write the dev document.
|
||
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Boris, re https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1733260#c2 - is the implementation at the point where we should document this? Can I ask you to ping us at the point where it is good to go?
|
|
||
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Hamish Willee from comment #3)
Boris, re https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1733260#c2 - is the implementation at the point where we should document this? Can I ask you to ping us at the point where it is good to go?
We will implement view-timeline in the next year. So perhaps we can start to document this without view-timeline (i.e. Bug 1737920). That means, let's document Bug 1737918 and Bug 1754897. I will add dev-doc-needed in Bug 1737920.
|
|
||
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Boris Chiou [:boris] from comment #4)
(In reply to Hamish Willee from comment #3)
Boris, re https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1733260#c2 - is the implementation at the point where we should document this? Can I ask you to ping us at the point where it is good to go?
We will implement view-timeline in the next year. So perhaps we can start to document this without view-timeline (i.e. Bug 1737920). That means, let's document Bug 1737918 and Bug 1754897. I will add dev-doc-needed in Bug 1737920.
So we can document this for "Scroll Progress Timelines" only: https://drafts.csswg.org/scroll-animations-1/#scroll-timelines
|
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
|
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
|
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
|
|
||
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
Let's document this, per https://drafts.csswg.org/scroll-animations-1/#scroll-timelines. it is the combination of Bug 1737918 and Bug 1754897.
(I treat this bug as a small meta bug so still keep open until I fix other follow-up bugs)
|
|
||
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Thanks. That is pretty much sorted by the work I'm already doing for scroll-timelines. Probably a little bit more work to verify that the existing animation-timelines docs are correct against current spec.
Description
•