User contributions for 188.100.192.146

2 September 2010

• 22:4822:48, 2 September 2010 diff hist +26‎ Talk:R5 (bootleg) ‎ Put some structure in the above part of the discussion. (Again, no editing of comments whatsoever.)
• 22:4422:44, 2 September 2010 diff hist +2,542‎ Talk:R5 (bootleg) ‎ Properly structured the discussion (leaving all comments that are not by me completely untouched, as disagreeing does *never* validate censorship), and added my own comments (properly separated).
• 22:1922:19, 2 September 2010 diff hist +98‎ R5 (bootleg) ‎ Cleaned the media reproduction and artist extortion mafia propaganda, and replaced it with the real words for what’s happening, instead of “evil-association“ brainwashing newspeak.
• 19:1219:12, 2 September 2010 diff hist +21‎ Moon Safari ‎ Argent in this case has nothing to do with money. It’s a beach in France called Côte d’ Argent. Which also explans, why it’s always written in uppercase.
• 19:1019:10, 2 September 2010 diff hist +18‎ Côte d'Argent ‎ Typo in the name. Typographically, there is a space after the abbreviated word “d’”, and the apostrophe now is a real proper apostrophe (“’”), not the common replacement character (“'”).
• 18:1518:15, 2 September 2010 diff hist 0‎ Gnutella ‎ Typo. It’s “giFT”, not “GiFT”.
• 18:1318:13, 2 September 2010 diff hist +159‎ Gnutella ‎ It is pointless, to mention the version number of the non-Gnutella core. It’s comparing apples to oranges. The plug-in is the component you want.

28 August 2010

• 06:3406:34, 28 August 2010 diff hist +1‎ Classes of computers ‎ Whoops, missed a typo. Fixed. :)
• 06:3306:33, 28 August 2010 diff hist +737‎ Classes of computers ‎ Added more types of computers and small descriptions, fixed a typo (idiot’s apostrophe), added real quote characters.
• 05:3905:39, 28 August 2010 diff hist +187‎ Inner-platform effect ‎ The counterargument is of course wrong in most cases. (But not all, as shown.)
• 05:2505:25, 28 August 2010 diff hist −124‎ Inner-platform effect ‎ Removed the issues box, as I fully disagree with the critique, and no comment is mentioned. If you still think the article is bad, describe ''exactly'', why you think it is. No consultants!! ;)
• 05:2405:24, 28 August 2010 diff hist +769‎ Talk:Inner-platform effect ‎ →‎Notable
• 05:1705:17, 28 August 2010 diff hist +473‎ Inner-platform effect ‎ We also need concrete real-world examples. I think HAL is a brilliant candidate. Especially because people learned from it.

21 August 2010

• 15:3315:33, 21 August 2010 diff hist −15‎ British bulldog (game) ‎ All games have local rules. It’s a foundational aspect of gameplay and theory relating to games. It’s because different groups have different dynamics and hence games get adapted to be the most fun.
• 00:2800:28, 21 August 2010 diff hist +1,114‎ Talk:Transformation matrix ‎ Reply to Martin Rinehart.

19 August 2010

• 09:2209:22, 19 August 2010 diff hist −2,319‎ Foundations of mathematics ‎ I’m sorry, I moved the wrong section. See comment on removal of that section, two edits below, for an explanation why. (Or just look at the discussion. It’s all there. Don’t worry. :) Tag: section blanking
• 09:2009:20, 19 August 2010 diff hist +2,430‎ Talk:Foundations of mathematics ‎ →‎A working perspective: new section
• 09:1909:19, 19 August 2010 diff hist +1,352‎ Foundations of mathematics ‎ Undid revision 379747138 by 188.100.192.146 (talk)
• 09:1809:18, 19 August 2010 diff hist −1,352‎ Foundations of mathematics ‎ This is not a place for personal discussions. But don’t worry, I only moved it to the discussion page. Also I have left a proper explanation for why this is the right thing. :) Tag: section blanking
• 09:1709:17, 19 August 2010 diff hist +1,463‎ Talk:Foundations of mathematics ‎ →‎Removal of section “a working perspective”.: new section
• 08:4808:48, 19 August 2010 diff hist +117‎ Foundations of mathematics ‎ There is actually nothing non-objective about human thought. Thought is also just a process, controlled by objective physical laws. (Please leave concepts of religious schizophrenia, like “soul”, out)
• 08:3008:30, 19 August 2010 diff hist +147‎ Foundations of mathematics ‎ Clarified, that Hilbert’s “success” is *not* proving or disproving anything, since simply banning the opposition is just a primitive act of ignorance trough censorship.
• 08:2308:23, 19 August 2010 diff hist +1‎ Foundations of mathematics ‎ typo harming readability. fixed.
• 08:2108:21, 19 August 2010 diff hist +223‎ Reductio ad absurdum ‎ Added a sentence, mentioning that this is only true, if you can correctly assume a dichotomy.
• 07:2307:23, 19 August 2010 diff hist −7‎ Surreal number ‎ whoops, typo.
• 07:2207:22, 19 August 2010 diff hist +189‎ Surreal number ‎ Added a bit of layman explanation, because it’s much easier, than the very poor explanations in this article.
• 07:0607:06, 19 August 2010 diff hist +2,480‎ Talk:Surreal number ‎ → Circular logic! The explanation is bullshit.: new section
• 06:5306:53, 19 August 2010 diff hist +65‎ Surreal number ‎ →‎Equivalence classes of numeric forms
• 06:2806:28, 19 August 2010 diff hist +56‎ Surreal number ‎ Fixed the layman’s explanation. Now it is complete.
• 06:1106:11, 19 August 2010 diff hist +51‎ Surreal number ‎ Added the much simpler ''intention'' behind the overdefined mathematical definition. That way everyone quickly can grasp it, but one can still check back. If I’m wrong, fix the simple sentence please.

18 August 2010

• 03:2803:28, 18 August 2010 diff hist +136‎ Talk:Movits! ‎ →‎Reliance on Stephen Colbert references
• 03:2503:25, 18 August 2010 diff hist +1,876‎ Talk:Movits! ‎ →‎Reliance on Stephen Colbert references

9 August 2010

• 21:5821:58, 9 August 2010 diff hist +142‎ Fallacy ‎ Who wrote this? Qeet evolved for the exact purpose of running barefoot, which humans always did, until recent times. Shoes are like gloves. You only wear them when you need them.

26 July 2010

• 08:2808:28, 26 July 2010 diff hist +267‎ Talk:Lonelygirl15 ‎ →‎WTF??
• 08:2408:24, 26 July 2010 diff hist +748‎ Talk:Lonelygirl15 ‎No edit summary
• 08:1908:19, 26 July 2010 diff hist +157‎ Talk:Lonelygirl15 ‎ →‎Bravo
• 08:1708:17, 26 July 2010 diff hist +320‎ Talk:Lonelygirl15 ‎ →‎fictive - fictional
• 08:1408:14, 26 July 2010 diff hist +655‎ Talk:Lonelygirl15 ‎ →‎So is this show anti-religious? As in all religions or just this "the order".
• 08:0808:08, 26 July 2010 diff hist +285‎ Talk:Lonelygirl15 ‎ →‎wikipedia and lonelygirl15
• 08:0608:06, 26 July 2010 diff hist +259‎ Talk:Lonelygirl15 ‎ →‎Just so you know: It was NOT entirely fictional!: new section

21 July 2010

• 05:1105:11, 21 July 2010 diff hist +12‎ Cripps Pink ‎ “Intellectual property” is a physical impossibility. Ideas can not be owned, possessed, taken away, etc. There are criminal organizations which claim so, but reality disagrees.