Talk:Pose (computer vision)

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved Rosedaler (talk) 12:54, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pose (computer vision) → Pose – Pose is used in many fields like robotics, 3D game programming, and virtual reality, as well as computer vision. Hence the name change to be more generalized. The “Pose” article currently redirects to an article with a closely related topic so I cannot make the change myself. EDIT: I see that I was mistaken about the redirect. Never mind. Please delete this request. EDIT: Actually, due to Wikipedia’s notability guidelines I would still like the change to occur. As the term Pose has many uses in technology now. Rosedaler (talk) 01:14, 9 October 2022 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). – Ammarpad (talk) 17:44, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Object to speedy move I object to this being a speedy move. It should have a full discussion. I also note the existence of Pose (disambiguation) -- 65.92.247.226 (talk) 04:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - not the primary meaning of the term. -- Netoholic @ 19:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose no way this is the primary topic—blindlynx 21:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. 162 etc. (talk) 23:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose per User:Netoholic and User:Blindlynx. Not the primary topic by a long shot. JIP | Talk 05:21, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heard. Rosedaler (talk) 07:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instead, maybe something like Pose (technology) or Pose (computing). Suggestions are welcome! Rosedaler (talk) 07:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pose (computing) is definitely a step up from 'computer vision'—blindlynx 16:03, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong oppose even ignoring the generic meaning the TV series has many more views (59,395) than the computer vision (954)[[1]] perhaps no primary topic but definitely not this one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 05:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree. please see my comment above Rosedaler (talk) 05:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  How is it primary over the TV series? The TV series is quite old and the generic meaning has more long-term significance. Crouch, Swale (talk) 05:50, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I mean I agree with you. I no longer want to move the page to Pose. I'm thinking maybe moving it to Pose (computing) would be better. Maybe closing the discussion makes sense Rosedaler (talk) 07:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• yes please close it then In ictu oculi (talk) 12:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]