Les principaux clients font pression pour des mises à jour de fonctionnalités conflictuelles. Comment hiérarchiser efficacement les commentaires des utilisateurs ?

Priority must be give to every task in a project plan. This allows a Project Manager to allocate resources efficiently when running the project. User/Client requests are normally the highest priority items. When client requests conflict, priority must be given to each, & one worked on first. This is b/c project teams that are focused are efficient project teams, IMHE. I faced conflicting requests on the Pennantview project. One client wanted pitchers analyzed first; the other hitters. I had to choose one. I used the Pennantview software itself to determine which analysis, hitters or pitchers, would have the most overall effect on the game of baseball. Hitters. And that's the one I chose first! #GatherDataForPriorityAllocation ☺️

Start by collecting detailed feedback from all key clients. Use surveys, interviews, and user behavior analytics to understand the specific needs and expectations. Ensure the feedback is documented meticulously. This helps in capturing the essence of what clients are looking for and sets a foundation for further analysis. Additionally, segment the data to identify patterns or common themes that emerge across different client inputs.

When faced with conflicting feature requests, begin by gathering both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative metrics like usage statistics highlight which features are most utilized and where improvements could enhance user experience. Qualitative insights from customer interviews and surveys offer context on why certain features matter. This comprehensive approach ensures informed decision-making aligned with user needs.

Data provides actionable insights that drive informed decision-making. It helps in identifying customer needs, preferences, and pain points, ensuring that the product aligns with market demands. It enables teams to validate assumptions, prioritize features, and optimize design through evidence-based approaches. By analyzing performance metrics and user feedback, data reveals potential issues early, reducing risks and costs. Collecting data(quantitative or qualitative) helps in data-driven decisions and it enhances product quality, improves user satisfaction, and increase the likelihood of market success, ultimately leading to more efficient and effective product development processes.

Tener un vínculo, accesible y fácil, como comunicación con el cliente, donde se puede reflejar su conformidad o falta de expectativas, es muy favorable para poder predecir decepciones y mejorar o corregir, un producto o un problema a tiempo

Prioritizing initiatives that offer the highest benefits for the lowest effort and cost is crucial. Collecting high-quality data, including user feedback and quantifying this data for a comprehensive perspective, is essential for accurately estimating the benefits versus costs and ensuring effective product prioritization.

Once the data is gathered, evaluate the potential impact of each requested feature on the product and the overall user experience. Consider factors like development time, resources needed, and how each feature aligns with the product’s strategic goals. Assess the ROI and how each feature might affect existing functionalities. This analysis helps in understanding which features could provide the most significant benefit.

Prioritizing user feedback involves analyzing the potential impact of each feature update. Assess alignment with the product's core value proposition and long-term strategy. Determine if updates benefit the majority or a vocal minority of users. Evaluate technical feasibility and resource requirements, considering how seemingly small changes can impact product architecture.

Cuando se toma en cuenta una sugerencia , sobre un producto o una acción, hay que tomar en cuenta; si se justifica el cambio, si la mejora , va a ser favorable, si es viable, si económicamente tiene afectación, y se permite en el costo, tiempo /dinero. Tomando, estas mínimas razones más comunes y el servicio al usuario, se resuelve; por sí o por no

Engage openly with clients, outlining your development process and how you prioritize feature requests. Transparency builds trust, showing clients their feedback is valued while balancing diverse user needs and product direction. Seek common ground or alternative solutions where possible.

El Cliente, siempre tiene que quedar satisfecho, de la atención, por lo cual se le debe una escucha respetuosa de su queja, y explicarle de la forma más clara que tenemos la intención de entenderlo y solucionarle el problema, hacer notar si su queja tiene un origen personal o del producto. Para el primero, está el Servicio al Cliente. El segundo, se debe tratar para retroalimentación de Control de Calidad o innovación.

Engage in open dialogues with key clients to discuss their feedback and explain the analysis. This step is crucial for managing expectations and building trust. By involving clients in the prioritization process, you can ensure they feel heard and valued. It also provides an opportunity to clarify any misunderstandings and negotiate compromises if necessary. Regular updates and transparent communication are essential during this phase.

Prioritization frameworks like MoSCoW (Must have, Should have, Could have, Won't have) are invaluable. They categorize features based on necessity and impact, creating clear roadmaps. Communicating decisions using this method shows clients the rationale behind prioritization, fostering understanding and alignment.

In addition to using the MoSCoW framework, you want to also ensure that you place the suggestion side by side the voice of the product team and the business. This helps to to prioritize appropriately.

I've adopted some of the methods below to manage conflicting requests and their prioritization; this makes sense, especially in enterprise SaaS companies. 1. Product Roadmap Gamification: Bring your sales team and give them 100 points each to vote on competing features. 2. Strategic Alignment with Exec Team: Based on company strategy, e.g., Focus on growth vs. Focus on profits, align your product strategy and related features. Competing features must also be aligned with the overall company & product strategy. 3. Moscow is invaluable, too, but it's difficult to tie them into a theme that customers broadly can buy into. 4. Build a customer advisory board for a more personal touch on the constraints of your prioritization.

Implementing updates in small, iterative cycles enables testing and refinement based on real user feedback. This agile approach allows quick adjustment if features don't meet needs or cause issues, showing clients responsiveness and commitment to improvement. It mitigates disappointment if their requested feature isn't prioritized immediately.

La diligencia rápida, se puede controlar, con la contribución anterior, la misma puede testear las características en sus porcentajes y Tiempos de respuesta. Finalizando con la consulta al cliente de su satisfacción en tiempo y forma

In today's speed of data analytics and full visibility of status, you must change the strategy to continuous monitoring of any results, either daily or instantously.  You can't wait for the updated reports and insights provided by others. The control must be swift and agile to meet the supersonic situations.

Voice of the customer is the heartbeat of every top notch product organization. I have found the interlock between client owners and product to be the key to that ongoing dialogue that is critical to prioritizing product roadmaps and features. Be in lockstep with your clients to ensure that every product development effort is a co-collaboration. Otherwise, you run the risk of low performing new products that miss the mark on functionality your clients really need. Zero billers are the death knell.

It's important to create a safe an effective space for stakeholders to communicate with you and with their own units. If the work is conducted appropriately, the company (not the developers) are given complete control of what items to develop next. Development teams moderate the conversation the the right fashion and offer the opportunity and methods for stakeholders to drive the development towards items that have the most meaning to support the company strategy.

I feel, when it is about conflicting features and prioritization table preparation, a preliminary approach through Kano model can be a insightful objective in customer handling. Feature presence vs Satisfaction level one page view before prioritization. We need to be very clear about the Necessity, Absolute necessity, Luxury and Insight nature of the feature surely but on top of it the KANO model approach gives clear direction towards addition/deletion of a feature based on customer's interest. Relevant opportunities or future fit features inclusion interests are very necessary to correlate with organization's Strategic D&A program.