Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Heightmap process seems to gradually lower Z flying height during processing until bit touches PCB during XY-move #626

Open
poes8943 opened this issue Feb 11, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@poes8943
Copy link

poes8943 commented Feb 11, 2024

Versions

  • Candle version: 1.1.7
  • Firmware version: 1.1f
  • Milling Machine: CNC 1419

PC info

  • OS: Win10Pro

Describe the bug
Heightmap process seems to gradually lower Z flying height during processing until bit touches PCB during XY-move

To Reproduce
using standard probe command: G21G91G38.2Z-30F100; G0Z1; G38.2Z-2F10
doing a manual Z-probe first using Z-probe control button followed by a Z-move UP 0.5mm
starting a 3x3 heightmap (20x25mm PCB area) Zt:2.00 Zb:-1.00
automatic results using heightmap feature:
1.964, nan, nan
1.976, 1.966, 1.559
0.400, 0.784, 1.179
flying height of the probe gets lower after every probe until the probe touches the PCB
heightmap stops after 7 probes with ERROR:9
manual results: (doing the first 3 probes manually with Z-probe G command 'G38.2Z-2F10' and jog Z-up 0.5mm after probe)
Grbl 1.1f ['$' for help]
G38.2Z-2F10 < [PRB:0.000,0.000,0.009:1]
G38.2Z-2F10 < [PRB:10.000,0.000,-0.004:1]
G38.2Z-2F10 < [PRB:20.000,0.000,-0.018:1]
The manual process gives reasonable values ... so stepper motors and spindles seem to be fine and I am not loosing any step counts.
... no ideas why this happens ... any clues or known issues?

Expected behavior
There should be no difference between 'manual' and automatic heightmap.

@poes8943
Copy link
Author

poes8943 commented Feb 11, 2024

further test steps using Z-probe control button:

  1. push Z-probe control button and perform a Z-zero after that (work coordinates now at 0.000 0.000 0.000)
  2. jog Z-up 0.5mm and pushing Z-probe control button again (Z axis work coordinate at 0.399 now)
  3. jog Z-up 0.5mm and pushing Z-probe control button again (Z axis work coordinate at 0.807 now)
  4. jog Z-up 0.5mm and pushing Z-probe control button again (Z axis work coordinate at 1.199 now)
    ... there seems to be roughly an error of 0.4mm after each step and values adding up ...

same test with manual commands:

  1. push Z-probe control button and perform a Z-zero after that (work coordinates now at 0.000 0.000 0.000)
  2. jog Z-up 0.5mm and executing 'G38.2Z-2F10' (Z axis work coordinate at 0.009 now)
  3. jog Z-up 0.5mm and executing 'G38.2Z-2F10' (Z axis work coordinate at 0.006 now)
  4. jog Z-up 0.5mm and executing 'G38.2Z-2F10' (Z axis work coordinate at 0.007 now)
@mar0x
Copy link

mar0x commented Feb 11, 2024

Hello,
Please follow the long discussion in #550 maybe you find something useful.

@poes8943
Copy link
Author

thanks - was reading #550 some hours ago but seems not to solve my issue (revisiting the thread again)

@Hostaler
Copy link

Hostaler commented Feb 11, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants