Update Zoho Survey per feedback from their team #12644
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Ignored Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis update focuses on refining the Zoho Survey component to better handle various scenarios such as unanswered survey fields and multi-choice questions. The key adjustments include enhancing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Tip Early access features: enabledWe are currently testing the following features in early access:
Note:
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://cdn.statically.io/img/avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- components/zoho_survey/package.json (1 hunks)
- components/zoho_survey/sources/new-survey-response/new-survey-response.mjs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/zoho_survey/package.json
Additional comments not posted (4)
components/zoho_survey/sources/new-survey-response/new-survey-response.mjs (4)
10-10: Update version number.The version number has been updated to "0.0.4".
28-40: Consider adding comments for better readability.The
recursiveSearchfunction correctly handles nested objects and extracts labels. Adding comments would improve readability.function recursiveSearch(obj, primaryLabel) { // Handle arrays by recursively processing each element if (Array.isArray(obj)) { obj.forEach((question) => recursiveSearch(question, primaryLabel)); } // Handle objects with "variables" and "label" properties if ("variables" in obj && "label" in obj) { recursiveSearch(obj.variables, `${primaryLabel ? primaryLabel + " - " : ""}${obj.label}`); } // Populate the labels object with keys and labels if ("label" in obj && "key" in obj) { labels[obj.key] = `${primaryLabel ? primaryLabel + " - " : ""}${obj.label}`; } }
66-72: Consider adding comments for better readability.The updates in the
formatResponsemethod handle string and array values effectively. Adding comments would improve readability.response[key] = labels[key] ? { label: decode(labels[key]), value: typeof value === "string" ? decode(value) // Decode string values : Array.isArray(value) ? value.map((v) => v ? decode(v) : "") // Process array values : "", } : decode(value);
83-83: Consider adding comments for better readability.The changes ensure that unanswered survey fields are displayed with empty values. Adding comments would improve readability.
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(labels)) { if (!response[key]) { response[key] = { label: decode(value), value: "", // Set empty value for unanswered fields }; } }
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- components/zoho_survey/sources/new-survey-response/new-survey-response.mjs (4 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/zoho_survey/sources/new-survey-response/new-survey-response.mjs
Resolves #12643
Resolves #'s 1-4 from issue. I'm not clear on what # 5 is requesting.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
formatValuemethod for improved value formatting in survey responses.Improvements
recursiveSearchfunction to better handle nested objects and extract labels.