Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accordion: Attempt at improving animation. #587

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from

Conversation

scottgonzalez
Copy link
Member

This is an attempt at fixing #4178.

The logic is to use core as much as possible, then override the animation of the height of the panel being shown. Most browsers don't support fractional pixels, and even browsers that do support fractions can't handle the level of precision that we get during an animation. This causes the combined height of the panel being shown and the panel being hidden to jump around a bit during the animation. We try to deal with that by recalculating the total height at each step of the animation and adjusting the height of the panel being shown to account for any pixels that were lost or gained by the browser not being able to handle the exact values that were calculated by .animate().

This works great in Chrome and Opera. It's ok in IE and not so great in Firefox. However, this is better than what we have now in all browsers.

This code should not e committed as is. $.fx.step._height and the data key should probably be prefixed for accordion, there are var statements in the middle of functions, etc. This pull is just to keep notes around and hopefully provide a good starting point for a final solution.

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ $.widget( "ui.accordion", {
version: "@VERSION",
options: {
active: 0,
// TODO: animation option
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

actually animate

@scottgonzalez
Copy link
Member Author

Landed in 3d9f6b5 :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants