Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ISSUE-376: Removing the condition that looks for outputs in tfstate to decide if tfstate is generated or not #377

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2023

Conversation

jaswalkiranavtar
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is to fix this issue.

Terraform scripts should be treated valid even without outputs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 31, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 81.46% and project coverage change: -1.70% ⚠️

Comparison is base (3a96f68) 79.31% compared to head (54a027a) 77.61%.
Report is 17 commits behind head on master.

❗ Current head 54a027a differs from pull request most recent head 34b28a5. Consider uploading reports for the commit 34b28a5 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #377      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.31%   77.61%   -1.70%     
==========================================
  Files          23       24       +1     
  Lines        1750     2046     +296     
==========================================
+ Hits         1388     1588     +200     
- Misses        278      364      +86     
- Partials       84       94      +10     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 0.00% <ø> (∅)
unit 80.44% <81.46%> (+1.13%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
controllers/configuration/configuration.go 92.22% <0.00%> (-3.19%) ⬇️
controllers/terraform/status.go 77.41% <ø> (ø)
e2e/normal/regression.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
controllers/configuration_controller.go 79.94% <82.42%> (+2.58%) ⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@chivalryq
Copy link
Member

LGTM. Please sign the DCO to pass test.

Signed-off-by: Gaurav Jaswal <gjaswal@guidewire.com>
@jaswalkiranavtar
Copy link
Contributor Author

jaswalkiranavtar commented Aug 31, 2023

@chivalryq Signed DCO, i still see codecov check fails. Our commit should not bring codecov down as we have not changed a lot, just removed a condition. Could you please help resolve this and merge the PR?

@chivalryq
Copy link
Member

Sometimes codecov it not concise.

@chivalryq chivalryq merged commit 4e21b54 into kubevela:master Sep 1, 2023
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants