Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create type aliases for unresolved type symbols #45976

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 23, 2021
Merged

Create type aliases for unresolved type symbols #45976

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 23, 2021

Conversation

ahejlsberg
Copy link
Member

With this PR we create type aliases for unresolved symbols such that quick info and error messages list back the unresolved name instead of just any.

In this example where ItemData is not defined:

function foo(items: ItemData[]) {
    let item = items[0];
}

hovering over item and items now shows ItemData and ItemData[] where previously we'd just show any and any[]. Furthermore, hovering over the unresolved ItemData reference shows type ItemData = /*unresolved*/ any.

Fixes #45893.

Copy link
Member

@DanielRosenwasser DanielRosenwasser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Largely looks good, though I think this needs fourslash and possibly syntax server tests, specifically for

  • find all references
  • go to definition (at least the fact that it doesn't work)
  • quick info
@@ -4520,7 +4523,7 @@ namespace ts {
const noTruncation = compilerOptions.noErrorTruncation || flags & TypeFormatFlags.NoTruncation;
const typeNode = nodeBuilder.typeToTypeNode(type, enclosingDeclaration, toNodeBuilderFlags(flags) | NodeBuilderFlags.IgnoreErrors | (noTruncation ? NodeBuilderFlags.NoTruncation : 0), writer);
if (typeNode === undefined) return Debug.fail("should always get typenode");
const options = { removeComments: true };
const options = { removeComments: type !== unresolvedType };
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be helpful to leave a comment on this one (pun intended).

Suggested change
const options = { removeComments: type !== unresolvedType };
// The unresolved type gets a synthesized comment on `any`
// to hint to users that it's not a plain `any`.
// Otherwise, we always strip comments out.
const options = { removeComments: type !== unresolvedType };
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, I'll add a comment.

@@ -8255,6 +8269,10 @@ namespace ts {
return type && (type.flags & TypeFlags.Any) !== 0;
}

function isErrorType(type: Type) {
return type === errorType || !!(type.flags & TypeFlags.Any && type.aliasSymbol);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not just this? Seems like it'd be cheaper too.

Suggested change
return type === errorType || !!(type.flags & TypeFlags.Any && type.aliasSymbol);
return type === errorType || type === unresolvedType;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, that wouldn't work. I'll add a clarifying comment, but basically we want to identify the special TypeFlags.Any types produced by getTypeForTypeAliasReference for an unresolved symbol. The sole purpose of unresolvedType is to act as the declared type for the special type alias symbols we create for unresolved names. The type is never actually returned by anything because getTypeForTypeAliasReference maps it into a special TypeFlags.Any type with an aliasSymbol.

@@ -4,6 +4,6 @@ async function foo(): Promise<void> {

// Legal to use 'await' in a type context.
var v: await;
>v : any
>v : await
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there some way to make the type writer a little smarter here so that the team can differentiate between an unresolved and a concrete type?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We certainly have the ability to tell the difference, but what did you have in mind in terms of output? Remember that we're often dealing with composed types, e.g. for var v: Promise<await[]> we can't easily attach a comment to the await identifier in the output.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A parenthesized type might work like (/*unresolved*/ await)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not really sure we want to do that. We're already generate an error at every reference to an unresolved symbol, I don't think we also want the extra noise in the type baselines.

@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

DanielRosenwasser commented Sep 21, 2021

I guess this doesn't technically fix #38836 because this only applies to types, right?

@ahejlsberg
Copy link
Member Author

Right, this doesn't fix #38836. One complication there would be what scope to introduce the unknown value symbols into. Should they be locals of the innermost enclosing function, or just globals like we do for the type symbols? The latter typically makes sense for types, but less clear for unresolved value symbols.

@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

or just globals like we do for the type symbols

I think just a global scope makes enough sense; if you do have a bunch of unresolved variables spread throughout your codebase, it's convenient to find-all-references, and likely to be a global anyhow; if it's mostly local (e.g. a user forgot to locally declare it), it doesn't really matter where you put it. But I'd understand if we wanted to take it one step at a time.

@DanielRosenwasser
Copy link
Member

Looks like there's a few conflicts that need to be resolved.

# Conflicts:
#	src/compiler/checker.ts
#	tests/cases/fourslash/findReferencesJSXTagName.ts
#	tests/cases/fourslash/tsxFindAllReferences10.ts
@ahejlsberg ahejlsberg merged commit a4f9bf0 into main Sep 23, 2021
@ahejlsberg ahejlsberg deleted the fix45893 branch September 23, 2021 20:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Author: Team For Milestone Bug PRs that fix a bug with a specific milestone
4 participants