Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: check inspector command Debugger.setInstrumentationBreakpoint #31137

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
May 12, 2024

Conversation

ulitink
Copy link
Contributor

@ulitink ulitink commented Dec 30, 2019

Adds test case for inspector's method Debugger.setInstrumentationBreakpoint with beforeScriptExecution param.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • tests and/or benchmarks are included
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Dec 30, 2019
@addaleax addaleax added the inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol label Dec 30, 2019
@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Jan 4, 2020

@ulitink is this ready to review? Or is this still work in progress?

@ulitink
Copy link
Contributor Author

ulitink commented Jan 5, 2020

@BridgeAR It is a test for an issue #31138. We can't merge this pull request until the issue is fixed because the test is broken. Sorry if such workflow is bad, we can simply reject the pull request and wait for the issue to be fixed, test is still referenced from it and can be found.

@BridgeAR
Copy link
Member

BridgeAR commented Jan 6, 2020

It is possible to add this test and mark it as failing in our status file. That way it would only fail in case this test passes. If I understood correct, this test is legit and it should pass while it fails at the moment. That way it's possible to just remove the test from our status file while fixing the issue.

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jan 6, 2020

It is possible to add this test and mark it as failing in our status file. That way it would only fail in case this test passes. If I understood correct, this test is legit and it should pass while it fails at the moment. That way it's possible to just remove the test from our status file while fixing the issue.

If the test fails 100% of the time, probably best to put it in known_issues and then we can move it out to parallel (or wherever) when the fix is committed.

@ulitink ulitink marked this pull request as ready for review January 11, 2020 03:05
Copy link
Member

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

RSLGTM

@Trott
Copy link
Member

Trott commented Jan 14, 2020

@nodejs/inspector

@BridgeAR BridgeAR force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 8ae28ff to 2935f72 Compare May 31, 2020 12:19
@gireeshpunathil gireeshpunathil added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 5, 2020
@gireeshpunathil
Copy link
Member

Is this ready to land?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 5, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@aduh95 aduh95 closed this Sep 18, 2023
@aduh95 aduh95 reopened this Sep 18, 2023
@aduh95 aduh95 added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Sep 18, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Sep 18, 2023
@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the inspector-instrumentation-breakpoint branch from ec2b8e9 to c6d069d Compare October 23, 2023 18:21
@larson-carter
Copy link
Member

This is a quite old PR, I see it ties into #31138 is there any updates?

'use strict';
const common = require('../common');

common.skipIfInspectorDisabled();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like skipping makes the test succeeds, which is considered a failure for known_issues/ tests..

@aduh95 aduh95 force-pushed the inspector-instrumentation-breakpoint branch from c6d069d to 29607a1 Compare May 11, 2024 08:42
@aduh95 aduh95 merged commit 291c121 into nodejs:main May 12, 2024
50 checks passed
@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented May 12, 2024

Landed in 291c121

targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2024
PR-URL: #31137
Refs: #31138
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
PR-URL: #31137
Refs: #31138
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
PR-URL: #31137
Refs: #31138
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
marco-ippolito pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2024
PR-URL: #31137
Refs: #31138
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
sophonieb pushed a commit to sophonieb/node that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#31137
Refs: nodejs#31138
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
bmeck pushed a commit to bmeck/node that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2024
PR-URL: nodejs#31137
Refs: nodejs#31138
Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. inspector Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
9 participants