-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 450
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmark Testing #147
Comments
hi
thank you for pointing out this opportunity. At the moment we are busy with other developments, so we have to postpone benchmarking. In detail, we plan to spend next months in optimizing the speed of Chrono, so benchmarking must be a later priority.
thanks
Alessandro
Il 3/31/2019 7:06 PM, acxz ha scritto:
There are many physics engines out there for the simulation/robotics community. As such, there is a need for benchmarking various engines for accurate and objective comparisons. Benchmarking also helps end users determine which is the appropriate engine for their task and for developers to help debug and better their own engines.
There is ongoing work for benchmarking at SimBenchmark<https://github.com/leggedrobotics/SimBenchmark>. As of now RaiSim, Bullet, ODE, MuJoCo, and DART have been benchmarked (results<https://leggedrobotics.github.io/SimBenchmark/>), but it would be great to have more engines benchmarked.
As such, I would like to invite members of the CHRONO community to help test & benchmark CHRONO under the same framework. Based on my (limited) knowledge, this is the first time such benchmarking has been openly available. Utilizing this instead of performing closed benchmarking is beneficial for both the robotics community as well as the CHRONO community.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#147>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE83BJa5sUuU82JuI4MVj2VUY6SM4jHuks5vcOsggaJpZM4cUa6b>.
|
I understand. I wish you all the best. I can't wait to see the results! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are many physics engines out there for the simulation/robotics community. As such, there is a need for benchmarking various engines for accurate and objective comparisons. Benchmarking also helps end users determine which is the appropriate engine for their task and for developers to help debug and better their own engines.
There is ongoing work for benchmarking at SimBenchmark. As of now RaiSim, Bullet, ODE, MuJoCo, and DART have been benchmarked (results), but it would be great to have more engines benchmarked.
As such, I would like to invite members of the CHRONO community to help test & benchmark CHRONO under the same framework. Based on my (limited) knowledge, this is the first time such benchmarking has been openly available. Utilizing this instead of performing closed benchmarking is beneficial for both the robotics community as well as the CHRONO community.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: