Skip to content

Issues: w3c/process

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

90 Open 386 Closed
90 Open 386 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

REC track diagram does not reflect normative text Needs proposed PR Type: Editorial improvements
#638 opened Sep 22, 2022 by gsnedders Deferred
8
Favoring weakest objections Director-free: FO/Council Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling Type: Enhancement
#625 opened Sep 9, 2022 by dontcallmedom Process 2024
5
a role should be a role, not a task Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call Proposed to close Type: Editorial improvements
#615 opened Aug 2, 2022 by TallTed Deferred
2
Consider making thresholds relative to active participation
#604 opened May 12, 2022 by cwilso Deferred
21
Require registries to include "enough" standardized entries Type: Enhancement
#597 opened Feb 10, 2022 by jyasskin Deferred
1
Recommendation track diagram does not show Rec maintenance Needs proposed PR Type: Editorial improvements
#596 opened Jan 18, 2022 by svgeesus Deferred
1
Simplify Process 2021 (candidate|proposed) (change|addition|correction) terminology Type: Enhancement
#590 opened Nov 22, 2021 by msporny Deferred
2
The 2021 "Revising a Recommendation Process" is painful for WGs Type: Implementation Not an actual issue about the process, but something to be handled for implementing it
#589 opened Nov 22, 2021 by msporny Process 2024
25
Charter review process Director-free (all) All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch Needs proposed PR topic: Chartering
#580 opened Oct 14, 2021 by mnot
5 tasks
Deferred
23
More clarity on where a "candidate addition" lives Proposed to transfer Propose to transfer to another group/repo, please identify in comment when adding label Type: Question
#568 opened Aug 19, 2021 by marcoscaceres Deferred
8
Is a Community Group the right place to develop our own Process? Needs AB Feedback Advisory Board Input needed Type: Implementation Not an actual issue about the process, but something to be handled for implementing it
#561 opened Aug 11, 2021 by dwsinger Deferred
20
Who can initiate and prepare a Charter? topic: Chartering
#560 opened Aug 11, 2021 by dwsinger Deferred
1
10
Introduction text Type: Editorial improvements
#555 opened Jul 24, 2021 by mnot Deferred
3
Organisation of 3.4 "Chartered Groups: Working Groups and Interest Groups" Needs proposed PR Type: Editorial improvements
#554 opened Jul 24, 2021 by mnot Deferred
4
Guidance for removing features in continuously-updated CRs
#553 opened Jul 13, 2021 by astearns Deferred
Single implementations and interoperability: showing implementation experience with fewer implementations
#522 opened Apr 27, 2021 by jeffjaffe Deferred
29
Approval Vote Experiment Questions
#521 opened Apr 26, 2021 by fantasai Deferred
4
[patent policy] Exclusion opportunity when work leaves a Working Group
#518 opened Apr 19, 2021 by hober Deferred
@wseltzer @fantasai
20
Related Members
#517 opened Apr 12, 2021 by mnot Deferred
1
reconsider STV
#484 opened Dec 21, 2020 by TzviyaSiegman Deferred
45
Ensure each proposal fulfils the goals of the W3C
#475 opened Dec 16, 2020 by jwrosewell Deferred
3
Anonymous input for offline debate Proposed to close
#469 opened Dec 16, 2020 by jwrosewell Deferred
20
Clarify deadline for nominations Needs proposed PR
#464 opened Dec 3, 2020 by fantasai Deferred
3
Do we need a procedural track for "disclosure" documents?
#460 opened Oct 29, 2020 by dwsinger Deferred
10
Need for Policy for Submission Requests AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. Type: Enhancement
#442 opened Aug 13, 2020 by plehegar Deferred
1
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.