-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
Issues: w3c/process
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
repo name nit: it'd be nice if this were simply w3c/process
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Repository operation
FPWD and joint deliverables—the process may be missing an exclusion opportunity
Closed: Out of Scope
Closed: Question answered
Used when the discussion has reached a conclusion, but wasn't an actual issue against the Process.
#869
by hober
was closed May 18, 2024
Switching tracks **and back**
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Retire the "Streamlined Publication Approval" system
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Topic: Simplifications
Making the Council's short circuit a little more flexible
AB Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Ambiguity about (super) majority thresholds: of those voting, or of those eligible to vote?
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
TAG appointment ambiguity about ratification by both AB and TAG
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Run link checker on Process Drafts
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Chair should be required in charter
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
topic: Chartering
Ground the different types of groups / maturity stages in Problem Statements
Closed: Retracted
Closed by the person who opened the issue, no longer requesting anything be done.
W3C Decision needs better cross-referencing
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Are the rules for updating Registry Definitions appropriate?
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Type: bug
Stop citing the "superseded" TAG charter
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
living standard / candidate review snapshots need to address wide review issues
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
word order "W3C Group Draft Note" -> "Draft W3C Group Note"
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Type: Editorial improvements
Japanese translation of Process 2021
Closed: Question answered
Used when the discussion has reached a conclusion, but wasn't an actual issue against the Process.
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Type: Question
Normative prose for role of Chair / Team Contact cites informative reference for description
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit Director decision
New W3C Council and updated TAG Composition section errantly only includes Tim Berners-Lee...
Closed: Invalid
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Minority Opinions
Closed: Question answered
Used when the discussion has reached a conclusion, but wasn't an actual issue against the Process.
Type: Question
Dissent in AC review
Closed: Retracted
Closed by the person who opened the issue, no longer requesting anything be done.
Conflict of Interest in Council composition
AB Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Dismissal voting
AB Decision
Closing this issue was done with an explicit AB decision
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Editorial: dismissal
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Commenter satisfied/accepting
conclusion confirmed as accepted by the commenter, even if not preferred choice
Type: Editorial improvements
Avoid using two different meanings of "sustain"
Closed: Accepted
The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Director-free (all)
All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch
Director-free: FO/Council
Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
Type: Editorial improvements
Previous Next
ProTip!
Adding no:label will show everything without a label.