Skip to content

Issues: w3c/process

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
0 Open 10 Closed
0 Open 10 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Mo u notice Closed: Invalid Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied)
#663 by jackromo888 was closed Oct 19, 2022 Loading… Process 2023
1
Should potential appointees to the TAG be required to stand for election, to be eligible for another term? Closed: Duplicate Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied) Director-free (all) All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch Director-free: TAG Appointments Issues related to appointing TAG members in a director-free W3C
#622 by dwsinger was closed Aug 25, 2022 Process 2023
2
Terminology for team support of the W3C Council Closed: Out of Scope Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied) Director-free (all) All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch Director-free: FO/Council Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
#588 by jeffjaffe was closed Oct 27, 2022 Process 2023
11
Cite Horizontal Review in Sec. 6.4.3 Closed: Invalid Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied)
#587 by JaninaSajka was closed Jul 13, 2022 Process 2023
2
Ensure all specs & standards have published user research? [from TAG process repo] Closed: Rejected Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied)
#551 by torgo was closed Jan 12, 2022 Process 2023
3
Process should ask or maybe require folks requesting a document transition to CR to describe why/how they think the document is likely to exit CR Closed: Rejected Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied)
#462 by hober was closed Jun 22, 2022 Process 2023
@plehegar
13
Link to document on formal objection processing Closed: Out of Scope Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied)
#337 by samuelweiler was closed Sep 23, 2022 Process 2023
4
Team-Appointed TAG Chair(s) Closed: Rejected Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied) Director-free (all) All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch Director-free: TAG Appointments Issues related to appointing TAG members in a director-free W3C
#313 by mnot was closed Oct 27, 2022 Process 2023
9
"W3C Council" may have to hear information in confidence Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied) Director-free (all) All issues & pull request related to director-free. See also the topic-branch Director-free: FO/Council Issues realted to the W3C Council and Formal Objection Handling
#291 by chaals was closed Sep 22, 2022 Process 2023
4
provide clearer/common wording for transitions to Obsolete/Superseded status Closed: Rejected Commenter Timed Out (Assumed Satisfied) Topic: End-of-Life issues about rescinded/obsolete/discontinued Type: Editorial improvements
#141 by tantek was closed Oct 6, 2021 Process 2023
@tantek
7
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.