Ugh… sure seems like Microsoft is shutting down or retiring more features and services in the SharePoint Framework these days than adding or fixing things. Last year they announced the retirement of Azure Access Control Services (ACS), SharePoint 2013 workflows, and the SharePoint Add-in Model… all good retirement plans. But this latest announcement, the retirement of domain-isolated web parts in the SharePoint Framework, in my humble opinion, is a bad move. I get it… they don’t like iframe’s and think they’re a performance issue, but they solve a problem with the SPFx security model that some companies take issue with. And, worst of all, there’s no solution or migration path other than “stay tuned, we’re working on a yet-to-be-announced thing that might help.” At best, it’s a premature announcement. At worst, they’re taking away an important tool. Last week in my newsletter, I explained: ✅ why isolated web parts are important ✅ what security issues they address ✅ why I think this is a bad decision ✅ what my recommendation is for those who currently have isolated web parts deployed If you missed it, you can subscribe and read the issue here: Here we go again... ☠️ SharePoint Framework Domain Isolated Web Part Retirement https://lnkd.in/e8EPQAsu What do you think? Does this bug you too? Sound off in the comments! #SharePointFramework #SPFx #Microsoft365 #Microsoft365Dev
They really need to start implementing the new stuff before they retire the old stuff, or it will leave gaps. And with a little margin in-between to allow developers to catch up.
This annoys me for the same reason as you. I hope they come up with a good and secure replacement. This should be higher up the priority list than adding colors to folders
I'm 100% with you! - I think the biggest issue is the lack of awareness in regards to what domain isolation really means, when they removed it from the yeoman generator it was a lost cause, but I have a strong suspicious that folks would use it waaay more if there actually was transparency in how the permission model for SPFx works (there is, but no dev ever reads the docs)
Enterprise Architect | @Perspective Dragon ; M365 , Azure, Copilot and AI Advisor ; Tech Lead
1moThis one i really don't get it: this is a huge blocker for the new SPFx adoptions, I have a couple of Fortune 500 clients that are freaking out with this and things don't look good since Microsoft is not giving anything that can replace that ( at least I'm not aware until now, probably I'm wrong)