Regional Insights
![Global Technology Executive Survey Industry Insights](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.protiviti.com/sites/default/files/styles/is_solution_hero/public/2023-05/gettyimages-1439331448-rt-crop-643x489.png?itok=scjWSQKN)
View the detailed results of our global survey by country and region. Reach out to your Protiviti contact for more detailed insights or contact us.
![Global Technology Executive Survey Industry Insights](https://cdn.statically.io/img/www.protiviti.com/sites/default/files/styles/is_solution_hero/public/2023-05/gettyimages-1439331448-rt-crop-643x489.png?itok=scjWSQKN)
Does your company have clearly defined innovation goals?
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
---|---|---|---|
Yes |
78% |
79% |
79% |
No |
22% |
21% |
21% |
I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Yes |
81% |
69% |
No |
19% |
31% |
I don't know | 0% |
0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes |
76% |
82% |
78% |
78% |
82% |
No |
24% |
18% |
22% |
22% |
18% |
I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes |
76% |
76% |
78% |
90% |
84% |
72% |
80% |
No |
24% |
24% |
22% |
10% |
16% |
28% |
20% |
I don't know |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the below best describes the status of your company's technology innovation strategy?
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
---|---|---|---|
We have a clear innovation strategy |
54% |
56% |
53% |
We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
40% |
38% |
43% |
We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
6% |
6% |
4% |
US |
Canada |
|
---|---|---|
We have a clear innovation strategy | 55% |
49% |
We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
40% |
40% |
We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
5% |
11% |
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
We have a clear innovation strategy |
58% |
58% |
56% |
58% |
50% |
We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
36% |
32% |
40% |
38% |
48% |
We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
6% |
10% |
4% |
4% |
2% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
We have a clear innovation strategy |
42% |
58% |
56% |
48% |
58% |
54% |
58% |
We are currently developing an innovation strategy |
50% |
38% |
40% |
48% |
40% |
42% |
40% |
We have no plans to create an innovation strategy |
8% |
4% |
4% |
4% |
2% |
4% |
2% |
What percentage of your company's current innovation activity is focused on each of the following areas?
Shown: Mean scores
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
---|---|---|---|
Optimization (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
42% |
42% |
41% |
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
30% |
28% |
28% |
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
28% |
30% |
31% |
Other |
0% |
0% |
1% |
US |
Canada |
|
---|---|---|
Optimization (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
42% |
43% |
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
30% |
30% |
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
28% |
27% |
Other |
0% |
0% |
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Optimization (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
42% |
39% |
44% |
40% |
46% |
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
29% |
30% |
26% |
28% |
26% |
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
29% |
32% |
31% |
32% |
28% |
Other |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Optimization (of current systems, products, processes etc.) |
41% |
40% |
41% |
40% |
40% |
42% |
42% |
Building Resilience (against disruption) |
31% |
23% |
29% |
30% |
30% |
26% |
26% |
Growth (new markets, revenue, etc.) |
28% |
33% |
31% |
30% |
30% |
32% |
31% |
Other |
0% |
3% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Does your company have a dedicated lab or think tank that focuses on innovation?
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
---|---|---|---|
Yes |
56% |
59% |
58% |
No |
44% |
41% |
42% |
I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Yes |
60% |
44% |
No |
40% |
56% |
I don't know | 0% |
0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes |
53% |
66% |
62% |
64% |
54% |
No |
47% |
34% |
38% |
36% |
46% |
I don't know |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes |
56% |
46% |
58% |
78% |
62% |
50% |
64% |
No |
44% |
54% |
42% |
22% |
38% |
50% |
36% |
I don't know |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following best describes your organization's top three challenges when it comes to innovation?
Shown: Ranked #1
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
8% |
7% |
8% |
Board/executive buy-in |
5% |
2% |
5% |
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
6% |
10% |
6% |
Justifying investment in innovation |
10% |
9% |
11% |
Lack of diversity of perspective |
10% |
8% |
9% |
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
9% |
10% |
11% |
Operational challenges (for example, prioritizing "business as usual" over innovation) |
6% |
9% |
9% |
Organizational structure (teams, processes) |
7% |
7% |
8% |
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
15% |
17% |
15% |
Security risks |
15% |
13% |
13% |
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
9% |
8% |
5% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
9% |
5% |
Board/executive buy-in |
5% |
6% |
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
6% |
7% |
Justifying investment in innovation |
10% |
11% |
Lack of diversity of perspective |
11% |
9% |
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
8% |
12% |
Operational challenges (for example, prioritizing "business as usual" over innovation) |
5% |
7% |
Organizational structure (teams, processes) |
8% |
4% |
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
15% |
15% |
Security risks |
13% |
18% |
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
10% |
6% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
10% |
6% |
6% |
4% |
6% |
Board/executive buy-in |
1% |
2% |
4% |
0% |
0% |
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
7% |
11% |
16% |
10% |
12% |
Justifying investment in innovation |
8% |
8% |
8% |
12% |
10% |
Lack of diversity of perspective |
6% |
8% |
2% |
8% |
19% |
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
9% |
13% |
6% |
15% |
6% |
Operational challenges (for example, prioritizing "business as usual" over innovation) |
13% |
4% |
6% |
8% |
10% |
Organizational structure (teams, processes) |
6% |
14% |
8% |
0% |
4% |
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
23% |
8% |
24% |
10% |
19% |
Security risks |
11% |
13% |
12% |
23% |
8% |
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
6% |
13% |
8% |
10% |
6% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Architectural constraints (including technical debt) |
14% |
6% |
2% |
6% |
4% |
15% |
8% |
Board/executive buy-in |
2% |
0% |
8% |
4% |
8% |
6% |
12% |
Culture (collaboration, curiosity, exploration) |
2% |
11% | 4% | 8% | 6% | 4% | 6% |
Justifying investment in innovation |
18% |
6% | 12% | 12% | 10% | 8% | 16% |
Lack of diversity of perspective |
8% |
9% | 10% | 8% | 14% | 8% | 4% |
Lack of governance and infrastructure |
20% |
8% | 14% | 6% | 12% | 6% | 8% |
Operational challenges (for example, prioritizing "business as usual" over innovation) |
0% |
14% | 12% | 8% | 14% | 8% | 10% |
Organizational structure (teams, processes) |
8% |
8% | 12% | 4% | 6% | 10% | 10% |
Regulatory and compliance requirements |
18% |
11% | 8% | 21% | 6% | 25% | 16% |
Security risks |
8% |
16% | 10% | 17% | 14% | 10% | 6% |
Talent (upskilling, staff retention, resource capacity) |
2% |
11% | 8% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 4% |
Who is the key person responsible for driving innovation at your company?
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
Chief Executive Officer or equivalent |
5% |
4% |
3% |
Chief Information Officer or equivalent |
9% |
12% |
9% |
Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent |
45% |
47% |
51% |
Chief Operations Officer or equivalent |
5% |
6% |
7% |
Chief Product Officer or equivalent |
5% |
3% |
3% |
Chief Technology Officer or equivalent |
31% |
28% |
27% |
Other |
0% |
0% |
0% |
There is no-one driving innovation at my company |
0% |
0% |
0% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Chief Executive Officer or equivalent |
6% |
4% |
Chief Information Officer or equivalent |
10% |
6% |
Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent |
45% |
44% |
Chief Operations Officer or equivalent |
4% |
8% |
Chief Product Officer or equivalent |
4% |
7% |
Chief Technology Officer or equivalent |
31% |
31% |
Other |
0% |
0% |
There is no-one driving innovation at my company |
0% |
0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chief Executive Officer or equivalent | 1% |
6% |
4% |
2% |
8% |
Chief Information Officer or equivalent |
17% |
6% |
10% |
12% | 12% |
Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent |
33% |
48% |
62% |
54% | 52% |
Chief Operations Officer or equivalent |
9% |
6% |
4% |
2% | 6% |
Chief Product Officer or equivalent |
4% |
4% | 2% | 0% | 4% |
Chief Technology Officer or equivalent |
35% |
30% | 18% | 30% | 18% |
Other | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
There is no-one driving innovation at my company |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chief Executive Officer or equivalent | 2% | 8% | 2% | 2% | 2% | 0% | 10% |
Chief Information Officer or equivalent | 14% | 4% | 16% | 10% | 8% | 6% | 12% |
Chief Innovation/Strategy officer of equivalent | 46% | 42% | 52% | 50% | 56% | 60% | 36% |
Chief Operations Officer or equivalent | 6% | 12% | 4% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% |
Chief Product Officer or equivalent | 10% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 4% | 0% | 2% |
Chief Technology Officer or equivalent | 22% | 32% | 26% | 30% | 24% | 28% | 34% |
Other | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
There is no-one driving innovation at my company | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following type(s) of technologies, if any, does your company use?
Shown: "Currently using" responses. Multiple responses permitted.
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
---|---|---|---|
5G |
42% |
46% |
60% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
52% |
55% |
52% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
27% |
30% |
32% |
Blockchain |
46% |
41% |
42% |
Cloud |
76% |
72% |
74% |
Edge computing |
49% |
48% |
42% |
Internet of Things |
70% |
65% |
75% |
Metaverse |
9% |
7% |
8% |
No code/Low code |
42% |
35% |
25% |
Quantum computing |
24% |
24% |
16% |
Robotics |
23% |
26% |
25% |
Web 3 |
24% |
19% |
28% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
5G |
57% |
35% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
42% |
44% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
22% |
41% |
Blockchain |
46% |
47% |
Cloud |
77% |
74% |
Edge computing |
51% |
45% |
Internet of Things |
74% |
60% |
Metaverse |
10% |
8% |
No code/Low code |
42% |
40% |
Quantum computing |
25% |
22% |
Robotics |
23% |
25% |
Web 3 |
24% |
23% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5G |
63% |
58% |
60% |
50% |
34% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
39% |
34% |
52% |
60% |
54% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
11% |
28% |
52% |
34% |
44% |
Blockchain |
32% |
44% |
48% |
44% |
44% |
Cloud |
67% |
60% |
78% |
84% |
80% |
Edge computing |
40% |
54% |
44% |
50% |
58% |
Internet of Things |
57% |
64% |
72% |
72% |
70% |
Metaverse |
7% |
12% |
2% |
10% |
2% |
No code/Low code |
33% |
46% |
20% |
34% |
42% |
Quantum computing |
19% |
32% |
18% |
28% |
26% |
Robotics |
32% |
26% |
26% |
28% |
8% |
Web 3 |
16% |
22% |
22% |
24% |
16% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5G |
64% |
30% |
50% |
58% |
56% |
52% |
54% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
44% |
62% |
62% |
66% |
68% |
58% |
58% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
18% |
52% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 40% | 20% |
Blockchain |
28% |
50% | 38% | 44% | 44% | 48% | 46% |
Cloud |
72% |
86% | 78% | 64% | 80% | 66% | 72% |
Edge computing |
44% |
52% | 32% | 48% | 42% | 34% | 30% |
Internet of Things |
72% |
72% | 70% | 82% | 72% | 80% | 74% |
Metaverse |
2% |
8% | 2% | 14% | 16% | 4% | 4% |
No code/Low code |
14% |
22% | 30% | 22% | 28% | 34% | 22% |
Quantum computing |
16% |
16% | 16% | 18% | 24% | 8% | 18% |
Robotics |
22% |
24% | 28% | 26% | 24% | 26% | 26% |
Web 3 |
30% |
28% | 22% | 32% | 30% | 26% | 28% |
How concerned are you about the security risks (for example, breaches, data loss, improper controls, poor access management) associated with implementing innovative new technologies?
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
5 (Very concerned) | 38% | 39% | 53% |
4 | 47% | 38% | 30% |
3 (Moderately concerned) | 15% | 23% | 16% |
2 | 0% | 0% | 1% |
1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 0% | 0% |
US
|
Canada | |
---|---|---|
5 (Very concerned) | 35% | 44% |
4 | 50% | 38% |
3 (Moderately concerned) | 14% | 18% |
2 | 1% | 0% |
1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 (Very concerned) | 30% | 24% | 60% | 38% | 50% |
4 | 43% | 52% | 16% | 48% | 30% |
3 (Moderately concerned) | 27% | 24% | 24% | 14% | 20% |
2 |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 (Very concerned) | 42% | 64% | 62% | 44% | 48% | 56% | 50% |
4 | 36% | 12% | 24% | 42% | 36% | 28% | 32% |
3 (Moderately concerned) | 20% | 22% | 14% | 14% | 12% | 16% | 18% |
2 | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 0% |
1 (Not at all concerned) | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following areas do you consider the MOST important for maintaining an innovative organization?
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
Building the right processes and activities | 21% | 22% | 26% |
Enabling an agile technology environment
|
31% | 20% | 23% |
Fostering an innovative culture
|
36% | 40% | 33% |
Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms)
|
11% | 17% | 18% |
None of the above
|
1% | 1% | 0% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Building the right processes and activities | 19% | 27% |
Enabling an agile technology environment | 33% | 24% |
Fostering an innovative culture | 37% | 33% |
Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms) | 10% | 16% |
None of the above | 1% | 0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Building the right processes and activities | 23% | 20% | 22% | 16% | 28% |
Enabling an agile technology environment | 17% | 24% | 26% | 26% | 10% |
Fostering an innovative culture | 44% | 48% | 26% | 42% | 36% |
Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms) |
15% |
6% | 26% | 14% | 26% |
None of the above | 1% | 2% | 0% | 2% | 0% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Building the right processes and activities | 18% | 26% | 34% | 24% | 26% | 28% | 32% |
Enabling an agile technology environment | 30% | 22% | 22% | 18% | 20% | 24% | 24% |
Fostering an innovative culture | 46% | 30% | 28% | 32% | 30% | 30% | 20% |
Hiring the right talent (different roles and specialisms) | 6% | 22% | 16% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 22% |
None of the above | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 2% |
What skills-related gaps, if any, impede innovation at your company?
Multiple responses permitted.
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
Collaboration |
20% |
17% | 18% |
Communication and organization change enablement | 24% | 24% | 24% |
Design thinking | 38% | 37% | 34% |
Enterprise agility | 36% | 36% | 34% |
Lack of training | 18% | 20% | 19% |
Leadership | 11% | 12% | 17% |
Project management | 20% | 21% | 24% |
Solution architecture | 37% | 38% | 36% |
Strategic thinking | 27% | 28% | 32% |
Technical knowledge | 33% | 30% | 29% |
Other | 0% | 0% | 0% |
None | 1% | 2% | 1% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Collaboration | 20% | 18% |
Communication and organization change enablement | 25% | 18% |
Design thinking | 38% | 39% |
Enterprise agility | 34% | 39% |
Lack of training | 19% | 17% |
Leadership | 11% | 12% |
Project management | 19% | 24% |
Solution architecture | 36% | 41% |
Strategic thinking | 28% | 22% |
Technical knowledge | 34% | 32% |
Other | 0% | 0% |
None | 1% | 0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaboration |
18% |
12% | 24% | 12% | 20% |
Communication and organization change enablement |
29% |
24% | 16% | 28% | 16% |
Design thinking |
43% |
36% | 44% | 30% | 26% |
Enterprise agility |
35% |
28% | 40% | 40% | 36% |
Lack of training |
24% |
18% |
32% |
6% | 18% |
Leadership |
10% |
12% | 14% | 14% | 12% |
Project management |
25% |
18% | 18% | 18% | 20% |
Solution architecture |
45% |
36% | 34% |
44% |
26% |
Strategic thinking |
27% |
40% |
22% |
20% | 34% |
Technical knowledge |
36% |
34% |
26% |
32% | 16% |
Other |
0% |
0% | 0% |
2% |
0% |
None |
3% |
2% | 4% | 2% | 0% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaboration | 14% | 12% | 24% | 16% | 16% | 28% | 22% |
Communication and organization change enablement |
22% |
30% |
30% |
20% | 26% | 14% | 16% |
Design thinking |
38% |
32% | 24% | 38% | 32% | 40% | 42% |
Enterprise agility |
34% |
40% |
38% |
24% | 26% | 42% | 32% |
Lack of training |
24% |
18% | 20% | 14% | 18% | 18% | 24% |
Leadership |
8% |
24% | 12% | 18% | 20% | 18% | 16% |
Project management |
24% |
12% | 26% | 30% | 28% | 22% | 16% |
Solution architecture |
36% |
28% | 34% | 46% | 46% | 28% | 38% |
Strategic thinking |
30% |
30% | 20% |
36% |
42% | 34% | 40% |
Technical knowledge |
28% |
26% | 24% | 40% | 32% | 22% | 30% |
Other |
0% |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
None |
0% |
4% |
0% |
0% |
4% |
0% | 2% |
Are you using any of the following approaches to help drive innovation at your company?
Shown: "Yes, and it enables our innovation, helping us to deliver the results we would like" responses.
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
Agile | 64% | 68% | 63% |
Design thinking | 56% | 57% | 56% |
Hackathons | 43% | 37% | 34% |
Journey mapping | 54% | 49% | 53% |
Lean start-up method |
31% |
38% | 39% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Agile | 65% | 60% |
Design thinking | 56% | 58% |
Hackathons | 43% | 44% |
Journey mapping | 53% | 57% |
Lean start-up method | 30% | 35% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agile | 65% | 68% | 74% | 72% | 62% |
Design thinking | 59% | 56% | 54% | 62% | 52% |
Hackathons | 40% | 44% | 28% | 36% | 38% |
Journey mapping | 50% | 50% | 54% | 46% | 46% |
Lean start-up method | 35% | 34% | 36% | 48% | 38% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agile | 62% | 66% | 60% | 70% | 66% | 56% | 74% |
Design thinking | 46% | 62% | 52% | 64% | 62% | 52% | 70% |
Hackathons |
42% |
48% | 38% | 18% | 26% | 36% | 38% |
Journey mapping | 44% | 56% | 56% | 58% | 46% | 60% | 36% |
Lean start-up method | 38% | 46% | 36% | 44% | 28% | 42% | 36% |
How well do innovation leaders bridge the gap between technology and business needs at your company?
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
5 Very well |
28% | 31% | 30% |
4 Somewhat well |
59% | 55% | 54% |
3 Neutral |
13% | 13% | 16% |
2 Somewhat poorly |
0% | 1% | 0% |
1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% | 0% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
5 Very well |
30% | 21% |
4 Somewhat well |
57% | 64% |
3 Neutral |
13% | 15% |
2 Somewhat poorly |
0% | 0% |
1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 Very well |
29% | 40% | 22% | 38% | 30% |
4 Somewhat well |
58% | 50% | 60% | 50% | 52% |
3 Neutral |
12% | 8% | 14% | 12% | 18% |
2 Somewhat poorly |
1% |
2% | 4% | 0% | 0% |
1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 Very well |
28% | 26% | 38% | 30% | 34% | 26% | 24% |
4 Somewhat well |
56% | 52% | 48% | 64% | 46% | 56% | 72% |
3 Neutral |
16% | 20% | 14% | 6% | 20% | 18% | 4% |
2 Somewhat poorly |
0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
1 Very poorly |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
When it comes to innovation, how well do your company’s business and technology leaders collaborate in the following areas?
Shown: Top 2 Box scores (aggregate percentage for "Very well" (5) and "Somewhat well" (4) on our 5-point scale).
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 58% | 57% | 62% |
Governance, risk and compliance | 81% |
76% |
70% |
Innovation culture | 64% | 67% |
69% |
Innovation processes | 70% | 67% | 67% |
Innovation strategy | 81% | 78% |
83% |
Knowledge sharing | 80% | 74% | 83% |
Strategic leadership | 83% | 80% | 76% |
Talent upskilling and retention | 68% | 68% | 71% |
Transformational change | 74% | 71% | 71% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 56% | 64% |
Governance, risk and compliance | 82% | 76% |
Innovation culture | 64% | 66% |
Innovation processes | 69% | 73% |
Innovation strategy | 81% | 79% |
Knowledge sharing | 80% | 80% |
Strategic leadership | 83% | 81% |
Talent upskilling and retention | 70% | 62% |
Transformational change | 76% | 70% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 52% |
70% |
56% | 54% | 56% |
Governance, risk and compliance | 77% | 78% | 68% |
66% |
90% |
Innovation culture | 69% | 64% | 66% | 68% | 66% |
Innovation processes | 67% | 78% | 64% | 68% | 58% |
Innovation strategy | 80% | 82% | 68% | 80% | 78% |
Knowledge sharing | 74% |
84% |
68% | 76% | 66% |
Strategic leadership | 83% | 76% | 80% | 84% | 72% |
Talent upskilling and retention | 73% |
74% |
62% | 70% | 54% |
Transformational change | 65% | 82% |
64% |
72% | 78% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educating non-technical board members on the benefits of investing in innovation | 58% | 60% | 72% | 58% | 66% | 56% | 64% |
Governance, risk and compliance | 66% |
68% |
78% | 66% | 70% | 74% | 68% |
Innovation culture | 66% | 68% | 64% | 74% | 76% |
66% |
70% |
Innovation processes | 70% | 64% | 62% | 74% | 70% | 64% | 74% |
Innovation strategy | 80% | 88% | 84% | 80% | 82% |
82% |
78% |
Knowledge sharing | 76% | 82% | 82% | 94% | 80% |
86% |
80% |
Strategic leadership | 82% | 60% | 76% | 86% | 74% | 80% | 66% |
Talent upskilling and retention | 82% | 62% | 68% | 74% | 70% | 68% | 68% |
Transformational change | 70% |
74% |
72% | 74% |
68% |
68% | 68% |
What impact is technical debt having on your ability to innovate?
North America
|
Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
5 Significant impact |
19% | 19% | 25% |
4 | 50% | 51% | 44% |
3 Moderate Impact |
29% | 28% | 29% |
2 | 1% | 2% | 1% |
1 No impact |
1% | 0% | 1% |
US
|
Canada | |
---|---|---|
5 Significant impact |
23% | 7% |
4 | 49% | 54% |
3 Moderate Impact |
26% | 38% |
2 | 1% | 1% |
1 No impact | 1% | 0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 Significant impact |
17% | 16% | 20% | 24% | 20% |
4 | 60% | 58% | 40% | 48% | 40% |
3 Moderate Impact |
23% | 26% | 36% | 26% | 36% |
2 | 0% | 0% | 4% | 2% | 4% |
1 No impact |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 Significant impact |
24% | 28% | 30% | 18% | 28% | 24% | 26% |
4 | 50% | 28% | 40% | 60% | 46% | 40% | 40% |
3 Moderate Impact |
26% | 38% | 30% | 20% | 24% | 36% | 34% |
2 | 0% | 2% | 0% | 2% |
2% |
0% | 0% |
1 No impact |
0% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
What percentage of the resources below would you estimate is dedicated to resolving technical debt?
Shown: Mean scores
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
IT budget ($) | 32% | 34% | 29% |
IT effort (human resource) | 20% | 19% | 24% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
IT budget ($) | 32% | 31% |
IT effort (human resource) | 19% | 23% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IT budget ($) | 38% | 39% | 27% | 30% | 29% |
IT effort (human resource) | 14% | 19% | 27% | 20% | 21% |
Australia | India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IT budget ($) | 31% | 29% | 27% | 28% | 32% | 25% | 32% |
IT effort (human resource) | 17% | 38% | 21% | 23% | 21% | 23% | 25% |
What are the top three strategies that your company prioritizes when dealing with technical debt?
Shown: Ranked #1
North America | Europe | APAC | |
---|---|---|---|
Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions | 10% | 7% | 10% |
Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it | 13% | 13% | 13% |
Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt | 12% | 9% | 9% |
Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business | 11% | 14% | 12% |
Having a process in place to track and report technical debt | 11% |
13% |
11% |
Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies | 9% | 12% | 10% |
Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) | 11% | 9% | 10% |
Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs | 11% | 11% | 14% |
Tracking technical debt in new systems | 12% | 12% | 11% |
Other strategies | 0% | 0% | 0% |
US | Canada | |
---|---|---|
Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions |
9% |
10% |
Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it |
13% |
14% |
Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt |
10% |
15% |
Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business |
12% |
9% |
Having a process in place to track and report technical debt |
13% |
9% |
Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies |
10% |
7% |
Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) |
12% |
7% |
Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs |
11% |
11% |
Tracking technical debt in new systems |
10% |
18% |
Other strategies | 0% | 0% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions |
10% |
2% |
8% |
6% |
4% |
Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it |
13% |
14% |
16% |
14% |
8% |
Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt |
8% |
6% |
10% |
10% |
12% |
Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business |
16% |
16% |
10% |
18% |
8% |
Having a process in place to track and report technical debt |
15% |
14% |
12% |
10% |
16% |
Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies |
8% |
22% |
18% |
4% |
10% |
Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) |
5% |
16% |
4% |
18% |
8% |
Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs |
10% |
6% |
14% |
4% |
20% |
Tracking technical debt in new systems |
15% |
4% |
8% |
16% |
14% |
Other strategies | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Appointing a technology leader as responsible and accountable for technical debt solutions |
8% |
12% |
12% |
8% |
10% |
12% |
12% |
Educating teams on technical debt and how to report it |
12% |
8% |
10% |
18% |
10% |
18% |
10% |
Formulating and following guidelines to managing technical debt |
17% |
10% |
14% |
4% |
6% |
4% |
12% |
Having a knowledge base to provide information even when specific employees have left the team or business |
19% |
6% |
4% |
14% |
12% |
18% |
4% |
Having a process in place to track and report technical debt |
12% |
22% |
6% |
10% |
12% |
4% |
16% |
Incorporating technical debt management into innovation strategies |
6% |
8% |
16% |
6% |
8% |
14% |
4% |
Revamping software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs (e.g., refactoring code, etc) |
10% |
4% |
8% |
16% |
14% |
6% |
8% |
Tracking software, hardware and systems where technical debt occurs |
8% |
20% |
20% |
10% |
10% |
16% |
22% |
Tracking technical debt in new systems |
8% |
10% |
10% | 14% | 18% | 8% | 12% |
Other strategies | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Which of the following technologies, if any, is your organization using to help reduce or alleviate technical debt?
Shown: "Currently using" responses. Multiple responses permitted.
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
---|---|---|---|
5G |
48% |
49% |
47% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
34% |
37% |
44% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
15% |
19% |
12% |
Blockchain |
28% |
26% |
23% |
Cloud |
65% |
65% |
67% |
Edge computing |
36% |
35% |
27% |
Internet of Things |
64% |
58% |
66% |
Low code/no code |
18% |
18% |
16% |
Metaverse |
4% |
4% |
3% |
Quantum computing |
18% |
18% |
15% |
Robotics |
12% |
12% |
18% |
Web 3 | 13% | 9% | 12% |
US |
Canada |
|
---|---|---|
5G |
53% |
33% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
35% |
32% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
13% |
20% |
Blockchain |
29% |
27% |
Cloud |
65% |
65% |
Edge computing |
37% |
33% |
Internet of Things |
68% |
53% |
Low code/no code |
18% |
19% |
Metaverse |
5% |
3% |
Quantum computing |
18% |
18% |
Robotics |
12% |
11% |
Web | 14% | 8% |
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5G |
61% |
52% |
48% |
40% |
30% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
34% |
30% |
44% |
46% |
32% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
8% |
20% |
18% |
26% |
34% |
Blockchain |
20% |
32% |
32% |
26% |
30% |
Cloud |
64% |
56% |
60% |
74% |
72% |
Edge computing |
31% |
40% |
26% |
44% |
36% |
Internet of Things |
54% |
56% |
58% |
64% |
62% |
Low code/no code |
10% |
18% |
16% |
18% |
38% |
Metaverse |
4% |
2% |
6% |
4% |
2% |
Quantum computing |
11% |
26% |
14% |
30% |
20% |
Robotics |
12% |
14% |
12% |
16% |
6% |
Web 3 |
12% |
14% | 4% | 6% | 8% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5G |
56% |
30% |
44% |
52% |
50% |
50% |
44% |
Artificial intelligence/machine learning |
38% |
38% |
52% |
46% |
46% |
42% |
56% |
Augmented reality and/or virtual reality |
4% |
28% |
10% |
10% |
8% |
12% |
0% |
Blockchain |
20% |
30% |
24% |
20% |
20% |
26% |
28% |
Cloud |
64% |
80% |
66% |
58% |
74% |
60% |
60% |
Edge computing |
30% |
28% |
30% |
24% |
28% |
20% |
24% |
Internet of Things |
64% |
62% |
66% |
66% |
68% |
70% |
64% |
Low code/no code |
8% |
22% |
20% |
10% |
18% |
20% |
14% |
Metaverse |
4% |
6% |
2% |
0% |
2% |
4% |
2% |
Quantum computing |
18% |
16% |
12% |
18% |
18% |
8% |
14% |
Robotics |
14% |
26% |
18% |
16% |
12% |
20% |
14% |
Web 3 | 10% | 10% | 12% | 8% | 16% | 16% | 10% |
If an economic recession happens, how do you anticipate your technology innovation strategy/investments will change?
North America |
Europe |
APAC |
|
---|---|---|---|
We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
36% |
34% |
27% |
We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
46% |
44% |
53% |
We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
18% |
21% |
20% |
I don't know | 0% | 1% | 0% |
US |
Canada |
|
---|---|---|
We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
37% |
30% |
We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
46% |
48% |
We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
17% |
22% |
I don't know | 0% | 0% |
UK |
Germany |
Italy |
France |
Netherlands |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
42% |
38% |
26% |
38% |
18% |
We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
32% |
42% |
62% |
42% |
56% |
We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
26% |
20% |
10% |
20% |
26% |
I don't know | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% |
Australia |
India |
Singapore |
Japan |
China |
Hong Kong |
UAE |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
We expect to advance our technology innovation strategy/investments |
34% |
18% |
24% |
22% |
42% |
20% |
30% |
We expect to cut back on our technology innovation strategy/investments |
46% |
52% |
54% |
60% |
44% |
60% |
48% |
We anticipate no changes to our technology innovation strategy/investments |
20% |
28% |
22% |
18% |
14% |
20% |
22% |
I don't know | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
North America | Europe | APAC | |
Sample Size | 400 respondents | 300 respondents | 300 respondents |
Industry
North America | Europe | APAC | |
Financial Services: (Net) | 17% | 20% | 11% |
Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management | 4% | 4% | 2% |
Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets | 4% | 5% | 3% |
Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending | 3% | 2% | 2% |
Financial Services - Payments | 3% | 3% | 1% |
Financial Services - Private Equity | 1% | 4% | 1% |
Financial Services - Other | - | - | - |
Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) | 2% | 2% | 2% |
Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) | 13% | 13% | 20% |
Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) | 3% | 4% | 8% |
Media and Entertainment | 5% | 5% | 6% |
Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure | 5% | 4% | 6% |
Consumer Products & Services: (Net) | 12% | 21% | 14% |
Consumer Packaged Goods | 7% | 10% | 6% |
Retail | 5% | 11% | 8% |
Healthcare: (Net) | 16% | 10% | 18% |
Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) | 6% | 7% | 4% |
Healthcare Payer/Insurance | 7% | 2% | 6% |
Healthcare Provider/Services | 3% | 1% | 8% |
Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) | 11% | 20% | 16% |
Automotive | 1% | 4% | 2% |
Biotechnology/Medical Devices | 2% | 1% | 3% |
Chemicals and Materials | 2% | 2% | - |
Manufacturing (other than Technology) | 1% | 4% | 4% |
Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences | 1% | 4% | 1% |
Transportation and Logistics | 3% | 3% | 2% |
Warehousing/Distribution | 1% | 2% | 4% |
Energy & Utilities: (Net) | 10% | 10% | 15% |
Mining | 2% | 2% | 4% |
Oil and Gas | 3% | 2% | 3% |
Power and Utilities | 3% | 2% | 5% |
Renewables | 2% | 4% | 3% |
Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) | 21% | 6% | 6% |
Government | 21% | 6% | 6% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
North America | Europe | APAC | |
Less than $25 million | - | - | - |
$25 million - $99.99 million | - | - | - |
$100 million - $499.99 million | - | - | - |
$500 million - $999.99 million | 13% | 25% | 30% |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion | 31% | 29% | 18% |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion | 26% | 21% | 23% |
$10 billion or more | 30% | 25% | 29% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
North America | Europe | APAC | |
Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - | - |
$250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - | - |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - | - |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) | 23% | 29% | 33% |
$10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) | 17% | 29% | 22% |
$25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) | 21% | 17% | 26% |
$50 billion or more (62.50) | 39% | 25% | 19% |
Ownership Type
North America | Europe | APAC | |
Publicly held, for profit entity | 48% | 48% | 56% |
Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held | 8% | 14% | 12% |
Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held | 20% | 32% | 26% |
Government agency | 21% | 6% | 6% |
Non-profit organization | 3% | - | - |
Company Headquarters
North America | Europe | APAC | |
Australia | - | - | 16% |
Canada | 25% | - | - |
China | - | - | 17% |
France | - | 17% | - |
Germany | - | 17% | - |
Hong Kong | - | - | 16% |
India | - | - | 17% |
Italy | - | 17% | - |
Japan | - | - | 17% |
Netherlands | - | 17% | - |
Singapore | - | - | 17% |
United Kingdom | - | 32% | - |
United States | 75% | - | - |
Job Title
North America | Europe | APAC | |
Chief Information Officer | 12% | 19% | 20% |
Chief Information Security Officer | 14% | 22% | 8% |
Chief Technology Officer | 11% | 18% | 23% |
Director of Information Technology | 25% | 21% | 20% |
Senior Vice President of Information Technology | 17% | 9% | 15% |
Vice President of Information Technology | 21% | 11% | 14% |
US | Canada | |
Sample Size | 300 respondents | 100 respondents |
Industry
US | Canada | |
Financial Services: (Net) | 14% | 23% |
Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management | 2% | 9% |
Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets | 3% | 6% |
Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending | 4% | - |
Financial Services - Payments | 3% | 1% |
Financial Services - Private Equity | 2% | 1% |
Financial Services - Other | - | - |
Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) | - | 6% |
Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) | 13% | 15% |
Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) | 4% | 3% |
Media and Entertainment | 4% | 6% |
Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure | 5% | 6% |
Consumer Products & Services: (Net) | 14% | 9% |
Consumer Packaged Goods | 8% | 5% |
Retail | 6% | 4% |
Healthcare: (Net) | 19% | 10% |
Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) | 6% | 6% |
Healthcare Payer/Insurance | 9% | 1% |
Healthcare Provider/Services | 4% | 3% |
Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) | 11% | 7% |
Automotive | 1% | 1% |
Biotechnology/Medical Devices | 2% | - |
Chemicals and Materials | 2% | 3% |
Manufacturing (other than Technology) | 1% | - |
Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences | 1% | - |
Transportation and Logistics | 3% | 2% |
Warehousing/Distribution | 1% | 1% |
Energy & Utilities: (Net) | 5% | 24% |
Mining | 1% | 7% |
Oil and Gas | 1% | 8% |
Power and Utilities | 2% | 4% |
Renewables | 1% | 5% |
Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) | 24% | 12% |
Government | 24% | 12% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
US | Canada | |
Less than $25 million | - | - |
$25 million - $99.99 million | - | - |
$100 million - $499.99 million | - | - |
$500 million - $999.99 million | 10% | 20% |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion | 31% | 33% |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion | 27% | 24% |
$10 billion or more | 32% | 23% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
US | Canada | |
Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - |
$250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) | 27% | 12% |
$10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) | 20% | 12% |
$25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) | 18% | 29% |
$50 billion or more (62.50) | 35% | 47% |
Ownership Type
US | Canada | |
Publicly held, for profit entity | 46% | 52% |
Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held | 8% | 9% |
Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held | 18% | 25% |
Government agency | 24% | 13% |
Non-profit organization | 4% | 1% |
Company Headquarters
US | Canada | |
Canada | - | 100% |
United States | 100% | - |
Job Title
US | Canada | |
Chief Information Officer | 10% | 18% |
Chief Information Security Officer | 14% | 18% |
Chief Technology Officer | 12% | 8% |
Director of Information Technology | 27% | 20% |
Senior Vice President of Information Technology | 16% | 17% |
Vice President of Information Technology | 21% | 19% |
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
Sample Size | 100 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents |
Industry
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
Financial Services: (Net) | 27% | 12% | 16% | 24% | 12% |
Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management | 3% | 4% | - | 8% | 4% |
Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets | 6% | 8% | 6% | 2% | 4% |
Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending | 1% | - | 6% | - | 2% |
Financial Services - Payments | 4% | - | 2% | 6% | - |
Financial Services - Private Equity | 9% | - | 2% | 4% | - |
Financial Services - Other | - | - | - | - | - |
Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) | 4% | - | - | 4% | 2% |
Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) | 19% | 8% | 14% | 12% | 8% |
Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) | 3% | 4% | 4% | 6% | 4% |
Media and Entertainment | 12% | 2% | 4% | 2% | - |
Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure | 4% | 2% | 6% | 4% | 4% |
Consumer Products & Services: (Net) | 19% | 22% | 16% | 20% | 30% |
Consumer Packaged Goods | 11% | 8% | 6% | 18% | 8% |
Retail | 8% | 14% | 10% | 2% | 22% |
Healthcare: (Net) | 4% | 10% | 16% | 6% | 18% |
Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) | 3% | 2% | 10% | 4% | 18% |
Healthcare Payer/Insurance | 1% | 6% | - | 2% | - |
Healthcare Provider/Services | - | 2% | 6% | - | - |
Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) | 11% | 40% | 20% | 24% | 14% |
Automotive | 3% | 10% | 2% | 8% | - |
Biotechnology/Medical Devices | - | 4% | - | 2% | - |
Chemicals and Materials | 2% | 4% | 4% | - | 2% |
Manufacturing (other than Technology) | 1% | 8% | 2% | 6% | 6% |
Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences | 4% | 2% | 4% | 6% | 2% |
Transportation and Logistics | 1% | 10% | 2% | 2% | - |
Warehousing/Distribution | - | 2% | 6% | - | 4% |
Energy & Utilities: (Net) | 10% | 4% | 18% | 8% | 10% |
Mining | 3% | - | - | 2% | 4% |
Oil and Gas | 1% | - | 6% | - | 4% |
Power and Utilities | 2% | - | 8% | 2% | - |
Renewables | 4% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 2% |
Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) | 10% | 4% | - | 6% | 8% |
Government | 10% | 4% | - | 6% | 8% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
Less than $25 million | - | - | - | - | - |
$25 million - $99.99 million | - | - | - | - | - |
$100 million - $499.99 million | - | - | - | - | - |
$500 million - $999.99 million | 20% | 11% | 43% | 22% | 33% |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion | 36% | 32% | 19% | 25% | 25% |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion | 17% | 30% | 29% | 13% | 22% |
$10 billion or more | 27% | 27% | 9% | 40% | 20% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - | - | - | - |
$250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - | - | - | - |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - | - | - | - |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) | 43% | 33% | - | 10% | 40% |
$10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) | 39% | - | 50% | 20% | - |
$25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) | 9% | 17% | 25% | 40% | - |
$50 billion or more (62.50) | 9% | 50% | 25% | 30% | 60% |
Ownership Type
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
Publicly held, for profit entity | 50% | 50% | 48% | 54% | 34% |
Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held | 8% | 14% | 28% | 8% | 18% |
Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held | 32% | 32% | 24% | 32% | 38% |
Government agency | 10% | 4% | - | 6% | 10% |
Non-profit organization | - | - | - | - | - |
Company Headquarters
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
France | - | - | - | 100% | - |
Germany | - | 100% | - | - | - |
Italy | - | - | 100% | - | - |
Netherlands | - | - | - | - | 100% |
United Kingdom | 100% | - | - | - | - |
Job Title
UK | Germany | Italy | France | Netherlands | |
Chief Information Officer | 14% | 24% | 22% | 28% | 14% |
Chief Information Security Officer | 16% | 18% | 26% | 24% | 34% |
Chief Technology Officer | 19% | 16% | 20% | 18% | 14% |
Director of Information Technology | 33% | 20% | 6% | 16% | 16% |
Senior Vice President of Information Technology | 4% | 6% | 18% | 8% | 14% |
Vice President of Information Technology | 14% | 16% | 8% | 6% | 8% |
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample Size | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents | 50 respondents |
Industry
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Financial Services: (Net) |
12% | 16% | 16% | 8% | 8% | 4% | 10% |
Financial Services - Asset & Wealth Management |
2% |
- |
6% | 2% | - | - | - |
Financial Services - Banking & Capital Markets |
6% | 4% | 4% | - | 4% | - | 2% |
Financial Services - Mortgage & Consumer Lending |
- |
6% |
2% | - | 4% | 2% | 2% |
Financial Services - Payments |
2% | - | 2% | 2% | - | 2% | 4% |
Financial Services - Private Equity |
- |
2% |
- | 2% | - | - | - |
Financial Services - Other |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Insurance (other than Healthcare Payer) |
2% | 4% | 2% | 2% | - | - | 2% |
Technology, Media, Telecommunications: (Net) |
22% | 14% | 28% | 16% | 26% | 14% | 14% |
Technology (Software/High-Tech/Electronics) |
4% | 12% | 12% | - | 14% |
4% |
8% |
Media and Entertainment |
10% | 2% | 12% |
8% |
- | 4% | - |
Telecommunications and Data Infrastructure |
8% | - | 4% | 8% | 12% | 6% | 6% |
Consumer Products & Services: (Net) |
8% | 4% | 6% | 26% | 20% | 22% | 8% |
Consumer Packaged Goods |
2% | 4% | 2% | 16% | 8% | 2% | 6% |
Retail |
6% | - | 4% | 10% | 12% | 20% | 2% |
Healthcare: (Net) |
6% | 22% | 22% | 14% | 20% | 24% | 22% |
Healthcare - Integrated Delivery Systems (Provider & Payer) |
6% | 8% |
2% |
4% | - | 2% | 2% |
Healthcare Payer/Insurance |
- | 6% | 4% | 2% | 12% | 12% | 6% |
Healthcare Provider/Services |
- | 8% | 16% | 8% | 8% | 10% | 14% |
Manufacturing & Distribution: (Net) |
4% | 16% | 12% | 20% | 20% | 22% | 20% |
Automotive |
- | - | 4% | 4% | 2% | - | - |
Biotechnology/Medical Devices |
2% | - | 2% | 6% | - | 6% | - |
Chemicals and Materials |
- | - | - | - | - | - | 4% |
Manufacturing (other than Technology) |
- | 8% | 2% | 6% | 10% | - | 2% |
Pharmaceuticals and Life Sciences |
- | - | - | 2% | 2% | - | - |
Transportation and Logistics |
2% | 6% | - | - | 2% | 4% | 6% |
Warehousing/Distribution |
- | 2% | 4% | 2% | 4% | 12% | 8% |
Energy & Utilities: (Net) |
26% |
24% |
8% | 14% | 6% | 14% | 18% |
Mining |
10% | 2% | - |
4% |
- | 8% | 6% |
Oil and Gas |
8% |
8% |
2% | - | - | 2% | 8% |
Power and Utilities |
6% | 14% | 6% | 2% | - | - | 2% |
Renewables |
2% | - | - | 8% | 6% | 4% | 2% |
Public Sector (National Gov. only): (Net) |
22% | 4% | 8% | 2% | - | - | 8% |
Government |
22% |
4% |
8% |
2% |
- | - | 8% |
Size (Revenue in USD)
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Less than $25 million |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
$25 million - $99.99 million | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
$100 million - $499.99 million | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
$500 million - $999.99 million |
18% |
52% | 42% | 15% | 24% | 33% | 26% |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion |
31% |
11% | 21% | 11% | 7% | 27% | 24% |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion |
33% |
21% | 19% | 36% | 15% |
13% |
33% |
$10 billion or more |
18% |
16% | 18% | 38% | 54% | 27% | 17% |
Size (Assets Under Management in USD)
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Less than $250 million (0.15) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
$250 million - $999.99 million (0.62) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
$1 billion - $4.99 billion (3) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
$5 billion - $9.99 billion (7.50) |
60% | 50% | 14% | 33% | - | 50% | 25% |
$10 billion - $24.99 billion (17.50) |
- | 33% | 29% | 33% | 25% | - | - |
$25 billion - $49.99 billion (37.50) |
- | 17% | 43% |
- |
50% | 50% | 75% |
$50 billion or more (62.50) |
40% | - | 14% | 34% | 25% | - | - |
Ownership Type
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Publicly held, for profit entity |
54% | 44% | 38% | 84% | 58% | 56% | 32% |
Privately held, for profit entity - preparing to become publicly held |
12% | 8% | 28% | 2% | 10% | 10% | 20% |
Privately held, for profit entity - no current plans to become publicly held |
12% |
44% |
26% | 12% | 30% |
34% |
40% |
Government agency |
22% | 4% | 8% | 2% | 2% | - | 8% |
Non-profit organization |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Company Headquarters
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australia |
100% | - | - | - | - | - | - |
China | - | - | - | - | 100% | - | - |
Hong Kong | - | - | - | - | - | 100% | - |
India | - | 100% | - | - | - | - | - |
Japan | - | - | - | 100% | - | - | - |
Singapore | - | - | 100% | - | - | - | - |
UAE | - | - | - | - | - | - | 100% |
Job Title
Australia |
India | Singapore | Japan | China | Hong Kong | UAE | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chief Information Officer |
22% | 24% | 10% | 12% | 24% | 26% | 20% |
Chief Information Security Officer |
14% | 8% | 14% | 8% | 2% | 4% | 16% |
Chief Technology Officer |
20% | 24% | 26% | 22% | 24% | 20% | 18% |
Director of Information Technology |
26% | 12% | 16% | 20% | 28% | 20% | 18% |
Senior Vice President of Information Technology |
6% | 22% | 20% | 18% | 8% | 14% | 16% |
Vice President of Information Technology |
12% |
10% |
14% | 20% |
14% |
16% | 12% |